{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide serves as a methodological disclosure for an executive summary section.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.22,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.605
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The resulting summary provides a high level picture of the strengths and weaknesses of each option but cannot capture all of the subtleties associated with each option. For example: Sub-options exist; weaknesses can be addressed by combining options; attractiveness varies by region; assessment may change over time.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "03621862-0e1e-422b-b0b8-edae2870810e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.275
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "L.E.K. has drawn on a number of different sources in its evaluation of the 8 options, including: L.E.K.'s alliancing best practice review; Analysis of whole industry financials and regional train operations data; Stakeholder engagement; ORR's PR08 determination; McNulty review reports; L.E.K.'s prior experience; L.E.K.'s assessment of rational response.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0b418841-f0fa-4925-bc60-b674bbded2ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.535
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "L.E.K. has used a 5 point scoring system to help summarise the results of its evaluation of how well each of the 8 options performs in terms of each of the 13 evaluation criteria",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bbedce3c-0b25-4407-b619-838f0aa6e33c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.835
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Because the evaluation involves assessing future behaviours and outcomes, some judgement is required. The main body of our report contains a more detailed assessment of how each option could work in practice.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2c321e7f-b735-4047-8b86-04ce5d72fa24",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "572b891b-0daf-4044-b0b0-743a383bcde7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.085,
        "w": 0.805,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.125
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "L.E.K. has drawn on a number of different sources in its evaluation of the 8 options and has used a 5 point scoring system to help summarise the results of the evaluation process",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "badee0cb-90cc-40cc-ba92-c74db30e7f09",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "8a384828-5b90-4e3f-82ce-03a3f366ff67",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document analyzes the challenges in aligning incentives between Network Rail and train operators.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}