{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 43,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 42,
  "nextPage": 44,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a standard comparison matrix format to evaluate strategic options.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/43",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-43",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "97e71370-9966-4fec-8e2c-b2962c0418b2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Option title, Description, Evaluation. 1 All OMRE, All NR costs, Pros: Minimises the scope for gaming or perverse incentives. Cons: TOCs are unable to directly influence a significant proportion of NR's costs. 2 TOC facing OMRE, All NR costs that TOCs can directly influence, Pros: Focuses mechanism on costs which TOCs are better placed to influence. Cons: Greater risk of gaming or perverse incentives. 3 All OMR, All NR costs except enhancements, Pros: Allows enhancements to be dealt with through a different mechanism. Cons: Train operators unable to influence a significant proportion of NR's OMR costs. 4 Bespoke packages, Packages of costs agreed between NR and train operators, Pros: Focuses the sharing mechanism on a set of costs which meet three requirements. Cons: Could be significant work required to develop and maintain accounting rules.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ba9c4448-d770-4f5d-bcab-4703d9abcebd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "1 – Scope: Network Rail costs (5 of 6): L.E.K. has identified four main options for the scope of NR's costs. There are pros and cons to each",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "621c0b20-d11d-42db-8636-84d831cdc7fc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "0d58de8a-1be2-440e-86d4-850a4fc6f6de",
      "evidence": "table/data: Option title, Description, Evaluation.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "095937ea-7b14-4375-a444-104a5208756c",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured comparison of four options with pros and cons.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 60,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "53cbee0d-035e-431c-8c6e-4d3f99416443",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support L.E.K.'s recommendation.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}