{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 37,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 36,
  "nextPage": 38,
  "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 160,
  "notes": "The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/37",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-37",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "TOCs and NR are jointly incentivised to reduce the impact of rolling stock on the fixed infrastructure.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edab-7238-a54d-e457b7d7fd8d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "P&L impact",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edab-7238-a54d-eb0a88a2d1ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Note: * Based on an indicative sharing rate of 20% ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c6176526-5a32-41fc-b053-243abf09333f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table comparing P&L items (TOC revenue, TOC cost, NR revenue, NR cost) across 4 scenarios (No sharing, Full sharing, TOC and NR cost sharing, NR cost sharing only) with outcome rankings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scenario",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8505694c-cc38-4543-bec7-e1c4c7d53312",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Hypothetical scenario of impact of a notional reduction in VTAC due to a change in rolling stock*",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "da19835c-770e-470c-9b54-a3832bd26f43",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "1 – Scope: TOC costs (2 of 3): Including all VTAC related items in the sharing mechanism would give NR an incentive to help TOCs to reduce the cost impact of rolling stock on NR's infrastructure",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "33325924-65c8-4725-bdad-635abf2bbc16",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario Analysis",
      "slug": "scenario-analysis",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5ba8fb56-7f33-4237-b92a-a8c34fbf1af8",
      "evidence": "table/scenario: Table comparing P&L items (TOC revenue, TOC cost, NR revenue, NR cost) across 4 scenarios (No sharing, Full sharing, TOC and NR cost sharing, NR cost sharing only) with outcome rankings.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "scenario_analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8deaf1aa-1b0b-47b2-a306-0ee04ebf5bbe",
      "evidence": "Comparison of four distinct P&L scenarios to determine optimal incentive structure.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "be645435-00b6-4b95-89a5-02173f29f8e7",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "The document presents L.E.K.'s recommended solution, Option 8, bespoke line-of-sight deals.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}