{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 128,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 127,
  "nextPage": 129,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The table uses a scoring system (++, +, 0) to evaluate specific criteria within each category.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/128",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-128",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.33,
        "x": 0.092,
        "y": 0.965
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07d872b5-4d0d-40ad-9424-7d673d723e30",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.755,
        "w": 0.816,
        "x": 0.092,
        "y": 0.188
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Category, Criterion, Score, Comments. A. Stakeholder support, A1. Primary operators, ++, Very strong support. A2. Secondary operators, +, General support. A3. NR, ++, Very strong support. B. Effective incentive, B4. Scope, 0, Can include all cost and revenue items. B5. Alignment of incentives, +, The nature of these deals should ensure alignment. B6. Avoidance of gaming, +, The bespoke nature should reduce risk of gaming. C. Simplicity, C7. Simplicity, +, Intended to allow normal commercial activity. D. Focus, D8. Controllability, ++, Rationally, parties would only include relevant costs. D9. Directness, ++, Driven by identification of specific tangible opportunities. D10. Free-riders, +, Parties would rationally structure benefits. E. Scheme costs, E11. Scheme costs, 0, Parties free to structure deals. F. Implementation, F12. cost, +, Relatively minor cost. F13. Implementation speed, +, Some bespoke deals are already happening.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6534d127-1a41-4ef7-99d8-45c1b8dd7217",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.032,
        "w": 0.588,
        "x": 0.102,
        "y": 0.145
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Assessment: Option 8: Bespoke line-of-sight deals",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8552c35c-29af-4e84-8b10-070f36205b76",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "4d3574a1-fa4b-47fe-bcd9-52763ca3c4e2",
      "evidence": "table/data: Category, Criterion, Score, Comments",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}