{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 102,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 101,
  "nextPage": 103,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide details specific feedback from TOC representatives and mentions Network Rail's stance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/102",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-102",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "04a22198-3777-4ce1-95e2-ec4c7e5a74a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.7
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The TOC owning group that originally proposed the revenue sharing mechanism at the Chiltern workshop has subsequently redefined its proposals through its comments on L.E.K.’s Alternative Railway Structures report.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4bdd37a8-9c54-43a3-a468-b04b3811b724",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "L.E.K. described this proposition to a broader group of TOC owner group representatives at ATOC’s Franchise Working Group meeting on 10 December. It received support from those present. The main cautionary comment was that it would require DfT to waive the Clause 18.1 / Schedule 9 clawback of the FTAC reduction. No other negative feedback was received.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ac52b42d-9497-4e5a-8d04-20d7799ad8c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "L.E.K. further tested the concept at one of the LNE workshops. The reaction was generally fairly positive, with comments on commercial value, complexity, and the mechanism's ability to handle growth scenarios. The main concern raised was that it could cause NR to favour high commercial value services over others.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c9b5ff6d-bb3c-47ca-9567-516d89c64dbd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "NR did not raise any objections to this mechanism at either of the workshops in which it was discussed (Chiltern and LNE)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f5982fbb-9aee-4c46-a56d-bf68bd3350e0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "It's a slippery slope. You would find yourself in a situation where you have to tell customers that they are waiting in a siding because they are a low value customer base and you have to let higher value customers go past ...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edac-778d-bcb9-83609953019f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "L.E.K. tested the revenue share concept at two subsequent stakeholder events. The response was mixed but generally positive",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "279efb10-ee83-4b13-bd91-fde9cb6e5eaa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}