{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-24abc691ccd3",
  "docSlug": "dce3a56647225af7",
  "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 50,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 15,
  "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to compare three distinct segments of the supply chain, each with its own chart and key takeaways.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "scatter_plot",
    "bullet_list",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-24abc691ccd3/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-24abc691ccd3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-24abc691ccd3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-24abc691ccd3#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "International benchmarking validated industry’s concerns that Australian rail and port charges are significantly higher than comparators’",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95b-7408-8fba-f68629b7be7b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.0015
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Upcountry receival cost comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1887b5a9-aa33-478b-b804-26422f31d770",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.0015
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Domestic port cost comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f0a02b55-5df8-4d96-b5e1-19393ffb0a72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.0015
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Rail transport cost comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ef5d499a-f4e3-4e41-946a-87b6cbae8ac9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.0053
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Australian rail freight is more expensive due to shorter haulage, lower utilisation, and capacity constraints; WA is lower cost; SA/VIC have higher costs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1836254e-3881-4908-a6b0-868764621981",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.0053
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Australian port costs are relatively higher; differences driven by capacity utilisation; Canadian consolidation and investment supports competitiveness.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "70c1144f-be08-4cb9-857d-ea373150e894",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.0053
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Australian upcountry costs are broadly comparable to Canada's and more expensive than Ukraine's; WA outperforms other states; Differences driven by capacity utilisation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ae7addb4-ba05-4fc5-be2a-a08a773bb52c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Freight and port costs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95b-7408-8fba-fb6f4118c381",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "International benchmarking validated industry’s concerns that Australian rail and port charges are significantly higher than comparators",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dfe51dd0-19c2-4f63-b719-542bb1a60228",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "peer_benchmark",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "e1bc8c90-1b45-4760-9ea5-dc6621c02953",
      "evidence": "Comparison of Australian costs against international benchmarks (Canada, Ukraine).",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 12,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "f9df07d2-5085-41f5-94e1-f51592182fbe",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides evidence and proof through benchmarking and data analysis",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "cb4ef703-1b61-4294-b6d9-2f3ae309d827",
      "evidence": "The document uses a logic chain to identify areas for improvement",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To identify areas for improvement in the grain supply chain",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}