{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38",
  "docSlug": "96a8486593f55ff6",
  "documentTitle": "Indonesia case study",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 58,
  "pageCount": 69,
  "prevPage": 57,
  "nextPage": 59,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The slide outlines three distinct funding models: Coverage as a service, Government increases school funding, and One-off government subsidy.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38/58",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-1ca563606d38#slide-58",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "These are the \"what you need to believe\" for these P&Ls to hold true and what targets must be met for theory to meet practice.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f389-7267-bc9d-b40e18622ada",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1. This implies a one-off government subsidy that will cover 4 years of 4G, WISP, and satellite connection (assumed depreciation period), and 20 years for fiber\nNote: For each of these models there's the assumption that the cost-side analysis is correct. The cost side analysis is based on the open-source ACTUAL model by Giga (ITU/UNICEF).\nSource: BCG analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a0be3330-d863-491d-85f8-72c8aef9be8f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Model 1: Coverage as a service (revenue sharing)\n- The basic underlying premise of this funding model is that gov't input is needed to 'close the gap'\n- Around ~1400 people on average live around each school\n- ~41 are willing to use school connectivity in year 1, ramping up to ~140 people in year 10\n- Assumed growth cap at 10% of population around each school\n- Willing to contribute 0.5% of their Gross National Income (GNI) per capita\n- Assumed cut of 5% on capex and 10% on opex",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1c9bca33-c6b3-439a-8c04-9b52be9b831e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Model 3: One-off government subsidy\n- A one-off subsidy from the government is provided to cover initial capex expenditures and accompanying indirect costs\n- Could be financed by various methods, such as spectrum auctions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7f0a181d-622e-417c-9392-0f271f86da51",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Model 2: Government increases school funding\n- The government is willing to increase the average spend per student from 3.58% of GDP to 3.59%\n- This is equal to a 0.2% increase in government budget spent on education\n- Additional budget will be divided by the unconnected schools equally\n- Implicit assumption is that the government will continue with the financial support",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af2ad9d4-6c1e-4ff9-a64d-ec4b97916a78",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Detailed assumptions | These are the \"what you need to believe\" for these P&Ls to hold true and what targets must be met for theory to meet practice",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "99404c6a-f209-4b04-9406-61ae3a2eb743",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 65,
      "from": 54,
      "beatId": "be927f17-a574-4a62-8975-832269b2fe5b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides financial analysis and data to support the proposed solutions",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}