{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-f756cd395173",
  "docSlug": "218e190f9c6fa751",
  "documentTitle": "Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 19,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 30,
  "notes": "The chart uses a combination of bar charts for historical data and base scenario projections, with line overlays for downside and upside scenarios.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-f756cd395173/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-f756cd395173",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-f756cd395173.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-f756cd395173#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The outlook for infrastructure WPIP shows resilience under all three scenarios – as activity is underpinned by longer term investment decisions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edad-70d9-bd0d-e2ed14051862",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "New Zealand infrastructure work put in place, NZD$b, FY07 to FY25",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "02df637d-fae1-475d-b120-1c77b4ed1c56",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.66,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Upside scenario - 'sigh of relief': There is steeper trajectory of growth for infrastructure WPIP throughout the forecast period under the upside scenario. In the upside scenario, private investment is more buoyant, driving higher infrastructure WPIP when compared to the base scenario.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3682fb16-a1d2-4e5f-9ab8-40a755d3f2ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Base scenario: Key drivers for a projected upward trend for infrastructure WPIP under the base scenario include relatively strong post-pandemic private and public investment over the forecast horizon.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "64280e30-3abe-4ba9-8976-8e3d7a6fa5e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Downside scenario - 'stagflation': The combination of weak private and public sector spending on infrastructure drives a weaker outlook for infrastructure WPIP when compared to the base scenario, with recovery only occurring in FY25.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b8f65367-ead6-4291-ac57-719f14d03889",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "NZD$b: 7.4",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edad-70d9-bd0d-e5ac59b67d41",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.66
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Data is in June years and in constant 09/10 prices",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "01115e63-fc1a-4ec6-9437-e593d6271dab",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The outlook for infrastructure WPIP shows resilience under all three scenarios – as activity is underpinned by longer term investment decisions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3e845820-7704-4448-87a6-0da8d446b2e8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Step 4: Outlook for infrastructure work put in place - New Zealand",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2047d98c-a659-438f-bd8c-78d0c351043a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "scenario_analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f4474bf4-a7fe-45da-84e4-bbbf7f13fb67",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares three distinct future scenarios (Base, Downside, Upside) for infrastructure investment.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "e59f3242-ddde-42d7-b423-c44247722fe2",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "Scenario analysis and results",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f2b59aa1-ff14-44e1-9df5-4c384836e804",
      "evidence": "Outlook for work put in place and work done",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Highlight importance of analysis",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}