{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-50ad05619e94",
  "docSlug": "9f94bd47fed0c3d7",
  "documentTitle": "Semiconductor shortage: A different kind of trouble ahead",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Roland Berger",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 10,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "recommendation",
  "function": "recommend",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a structured list to present six key strategic recommendations for semiconductor supply chain resilience.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "numbered_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-50ad05619e94/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-50ad05619e94",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-50ad05619e94.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-50ad05619e94#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In our view, this requires continuous improvement to supply strategies and a design to risk engineering approach that includes:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-e58e-76cb-be62-71ebf446fc5a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.48
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1. Multi-sourcing supply strategy\n2. Partnerships with semiconductor companies\n3. Active reduction of legacy semiconductor content/proactive swaps\n4. Sprint substitutions/new ways of qualifications\n5. Centralized and modular E/E architectures with SW defined functionality\n6. Alignment of design process with the lifecycle management of product and components",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "92450630-bace-4cd1-a1ea-b0c8837e40c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Summary: Automotive and industrial companies continue to be confronted by short supply of “legacy nodes” – despite an easing of demand in consumer electronics. Newly passed government funding will have a limited impact in the near term, due to the relatively small budgets, focus on leading edge technology, and long lead times. To overcome this new kind of trouble, semiconductor producers and Tier-1 suppliers will need to manage the building inventories in consumer and digital applications, while automotive and industrial players must manage ongoing shortages of traditional semiconductor chips.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "158ef0fe-ce28-48f9-875e-92ae30a96671",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In the short-term, companies must focus on correcting and optimizing their inventory to improve their cash balance and eliminate unnecessary costs, while still maintaining bottleneck management of spare parts used in production. In the mid- to long-term, companies must address the structural imbalances that continue to affect legacy chip availability. This is especially true for automotive and industrial companies who are at the greatest risk in facing future shortages. In our view, this requires continuous improvement to supply strategies and a design to risk engineering approach that includes:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e73af39f-01e5-41c4-8cd3-f2d641828598",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Decision-makers must rethink their chip inventory management",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "630f1756-cc6f-44a4-9564-b24d5e79882f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Despite signs of short-term relief, affected companies will face new troubles ahead",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a05574d3-2618-4f18-83f4-b1b38b179926",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9144ad26-74fb-42a8-ad2a-2cfb8dc72ed6",
      "evidence": "1. Multi-sourcing supply strategy\n2. Partnerships with semiconductor companies",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "f18162d2-1112-4792-b97f-9a7388b881fd",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The deck provides a recommended solution to the problem",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "945b0bb9-cffb-45e5-a6ef-aa3c216a4bae",
      "evidence": "The deck implies that inaction will lead to negative consequences",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}