{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f",
  "docSlug": "6cb6906ccd008ecf",
  "documentTitle": "2019 Global Treasury Benchmarking",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.775,
  "pageNumber": 27,
  "pageCount": 35,
  "prevPage": 26,
  "nextPage": 28,
  "slideType": "pain_points",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 16,
  "notes": "The chart is zoomed in to show ratings 5-10.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "bar_chart_horizontal"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f/27",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f#slide-27",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.075,
        "y": 0.56
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Call to action: Treasurers should make an effort to examine the transactional fees they are paying to their banks and urge banking partners to provide greater transparency and standardisation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "85e981d4-6d41-428d-b495-4f61482f9cb0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Treasurers should make an effort to examine the transactional fees they are paying to their banks and urge banking partners to provide greater transparency and standardisation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b390-1239a7151f48",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.377,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Bar chart showing satisfaction scores for 16 treasury processes, with an average line at 7.4.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1c98f9e0-011a-41d6-9f23-d8f0c1d637a5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.075,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Spreadsheets remain the most prevalent solution used for tracking bank fees, yet spreadsheets are more prone to error. Despite a push for greater transparency and standardisation, quality of bank fee information is often still very poor. Banks continue to provide a high degree of customised and non-transparent fee information.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5949ee60-79c8-47c0-b5b2-0a298110cf0d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Satisfaction score: 7.4",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b390-17d39fb6609d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.075,
        "y": 0.065
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Technology support: lowest satisfaction scores for bank fee analysis and bank account management. Respondents estimated they spend on average $1.4 million for transactional banking fees to banks.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f6aba4a0-3793-46bd-811f-f597d2ec0e9d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.377,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Number of respondents: 190. Note: Chart below is zoomed in, showing rating 5-10.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "547e77e1-0145-4dee-8abc-4ce3c3013893",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.377,
        "y": 0.065
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "On a scale of 1-10, how satisfied are you with the Treasury system used for each process?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "774cd69d-6302-4a2e-a593-1c92144c0cad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de971-0a69-734f-a772-f736be5f5ad7",
      "evidence": "Title 'lowest satisfaction scores for bank fee analysis...' names finding",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Call to action",
      "slug": "call-to-action",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "2ff6ee6c-31a5-41a2-94dd-1524d46c55f2",
      "evidence": "Call to action: Treasurers should make an effort to examine the transactional fees they are paying to their banks and urge banking partners to provide greater transparency and standardisation.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Lie Factor",
      "slug": "lie-factor",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de971-0a8c-7048-b16a-3f233a07b505",
      "evidence": "Note states chart zoomed to 5-10 to emphasise variance",
      "confidence": 50
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 31,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de971-0121-72c2-8e7d-3ec771855007",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Cash/banking and financial-risk benchmarks back recommendations",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 33,
      "from": 23,
      "beatId": "019de971-01cb-76b0-9041-0db3601859ac",
      "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
      "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
      "beatName": "The Bridge",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Cash/banking, risk, tax recommendations and partner sign-off",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 23,
      "name": "So What Cascade",
      "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
      "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
      "matchId": "019de971-0297-711c-b36e-45c66c580730",
      "evidence": "Funding criteria (p24) -> review frequency gap (p25) -> cash left on table (p26) -> tech satisfaction (p27) all roll into action callouts",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Move from banking-criteria data to relationship-management recommendations",
      "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}