{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-25361bfb23b0",
  "docSlug": "4ffed4af8eb01612",
  "documentTitle": "SDG reporting 2018",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 23,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 22,
  "nextPage": 24,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The chart is a radial gauge/pie-segment hybrid representing a 5-point scale.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "donut_chart",
    "big_number"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-25361bfb23b0/23",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-25361bfb23b0",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-25361bfb23b0.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-25361bfb23b0#slide-23",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Overall the average score for reporting quality for those companies that had prioritised SDGs was 2.71 (out of 5) showing that companies are reporting on SDG topics somewhere between a qualitative and quantitative approach.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d9f4-73c3-b037-a22dbb104e32",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.513,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Radial chart showing distribution of reporting quality",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "pie",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d8d58dc3-0b20-4596-8ca6-ddcf8ed18ccf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.668,
        "y": 0.615
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Statement 8%\nQualitative ambition 41%\nQuantitative KPIs 28%\nQuantitative KPIs and targets 16%\nKPIs linked to societal impact 7%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "18c8ae28-3bbc-4ada-9559-232cdc72afac",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.06,
        "x": 0.715,
        "y": 0.315
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "2.71",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cc1d6edf-c522-4ced-a9de-9f665c0841fa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Average reporting quality: 2.71",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d9f4-73c3-b037-a7ddc47ca406",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.13,
        "w": 0.29,
        "x": 0.201,
        "y": 0.415
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The majority (41%) of companies who prioritised the SDGs have set qualitative ambitions/aspirations (i.e. a descriptive ambition) on achieving a specific SDG deemed relevant to the business. Just 28% identified quantitative KPIs for their relevant SDGs, and only 23% demonstrated meaningful engagement by setting targets or also linking to societal impact (See Figure 8: Overall quality of SDG reporting). In short, despite many companies claiming to prioritise the SDGs, only a few are putting concrete measures in place to hold themselves to account and work out the impact of what they are doing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "86b3c064-5af0-4e80-86d0-1144de27ee71",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.29,
        "x": 0.201,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "We think this improvement in performance could be due to a combination of two factors. First, we are one year further on since ratification of the SDGs in 2015 so companies have had more time to incorporate relevant measures on the Goals into their reporting. Second, the companies we selected this year are the largest companies from the participating territory listed indexes and so are more likely to have a higher quality of reporting in general.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8a5b5ee0-6793-43cb-95a6-48eee7bfb37c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.29,
        "x": 0.201,
        "y": 0.228
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Overall the average score for reporting quality for those companies that had prioritised SDGs was 2.71 (out of 5) showing that companies are reporting on SDG topics somewhere between a qualitative and quantitative approach - an improvement on the 2.29 rating from 2017.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "96d784ce-e39f-4800-a51b-2cdace3dc295",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.668,
        "y": 0.775
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Average reporting quality, marks out of 5",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "057b5c83-f515-427d-ab3c-fb23e4afd620",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.513,
        "y": 0.238
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 8: Overall quality of SDG reporting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e66ec0f3-62b3-4a2c-997c-b478e73af1da",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de96c-1c67-7480-a6d8-832545345df7",
      "evidence": "Donut showing distribution across 5 maturity levels",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Pre-attentive Attributes",
      "slug": "pre-attentive-attributes",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de96c-1c92-7274-bb35-a350dd112b19",
      "evidence": "Central callout bubble shows average 2.71/5",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 28,
      "from": 20,
      "beatId": "019de96c-1183-7182-b408-36622e145077",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Case studies of best practice, KPIs, 5-level maturity model, blueprint with 4 imperatives",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "019de96c-124e-736b-a48d-24a2211b35a4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Integration gap, framework alignment, reporting quality scores",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 19,
      "name": "Maturity Curve",
      "slug": "36-maturity-curve",
      "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking",
      "matchId": "019de96c-1315-7109-8ca9-1a5f7b54b55c",
      "evidence": "27% integration callout (p19), GEB case (p20), KPI benchmarks (p21), 5-level scoring method (p22), donut + ranked SDG quality table (p23-24).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Score current reporting quality on a 1-5 maturity ladder and expose where companies sit",
      "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}