{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18",
  "docSlug": "97143d2812b6a812",
  "documentTitle": "The Global State of Information Security® Survey 2018 Singapore highlights",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.707,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 8,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 15,
  "notes": "The slide uses two distinct chart types: a horizontal bar chart for incident causes and a grouped bar chart for safeguard adoption.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "More than four in 10 organisations surveyed in Singapore (44%) do not have an incident-response process, while a similar proportion say their companies have yet to conduct penetration tests (46%).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa3-77ce-853f-be9a7ac5e484",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.57,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 6. Safeguards that are already in place",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cb4db3b3-5784-4b3e-9ad3-a1e74d6a971d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.071,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 5. Areas where security incidents occurred",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "751cefbb-cf75-41e5-9563-1d11b8d04362",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.071,
        "y": 0.605
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dfd8c82b-c16a-4190-8687-77e6c6c78386",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Security incident occurrence: 44%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa3-77ce-853f-c39774122211",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.071,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In Singapore, responses reflected that security incidents primarily occurred through the exploitation of mobile devices (44%; Figure 5), followed closely by phishing (42%) which further suggest susceptibility to threats due to human error or negligence. As new phishing methods put users at greater risk of being invaded by malware.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24924f61-aa3b-4a1d-aeea-f8132a3beed4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.071,
        "y": 0.177
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Robust access control is also a necessity as it provides organisations with insight into their system users, and their levels of access, as well as the business reasons supporting the access by users. In addition, periodic access reviews must be conducted to ensure that only users with the necessary business reasons have access to relevant systems and data.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6eb7dba6-be45-471f-ab9c-b8cb52ae24b2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.01,
        "w": 0.17,
        "x": 0.3,
        "y": 0.575
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: The Global State of Information Security® Survey 2018",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2ebb3fe2-c094-4433-85be-c85af3bbf502",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.38,
        "x": 0.57,
        "y": 0.065
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Protection is two-fold: Security safeguards and cyber insurance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fd594999-f265-4561-8ed3-957cd666b960",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019de93e-54cb-724f-a609-37718a881d07",
      "evidence": "Loop opens here contrasting Singapore performance vs region/global benchmark.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de93e-544b-75da-9cce-612f9aeef2d1",
      "evidence": "Title 'Protection is two-fold: Security safeguards and cyber insurance' states the take.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de93e-5476-7566-a6a6-ae3f009d31a7",
      "evidence": "Figure 5 incident sources bar chart and Figure 6 grouped safeguards chart.",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d3d15a6f-347e-40d7-99d5-be7e1409b8e8",
      "evidence": "Figure 5. Areas where security incidents occurred",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de93e-54a0-70f8-9731-7154eeae31e2",
      "evidence": "Figure 6 repeats Singapore/AP/Global trio across five safeguard categories.",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019de93e-5084-722f-9641-2bc5d2a128e2",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "p4-6 interpret data: human error, safeguards gaps, collaboration upside.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "019de93e-515b-7098-8c5a-4e8ebe950e6b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Two-fold protection and cyber collaboration proposed as response.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "019de93e-5185-76bb-ad9b-cc5048d8b760",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Survey charts benchmarking Singapore vs Asia Pacific vs Global.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019de93e-5212-73df-aae3-272d6135b3fd",
      "evidence": "Every chart on p5-6 compares Singapore, Asia Pacific, Global bars side by side (e.g. 64/53/52, 61/45/37).",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Show Singapore vs Asia Pacific vs Global gaps on safeguards and collaboration",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}