{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-f44394ca4c72",
  "docSlug": "d3c3f38b5ba9a6d1",
  "documentTitle": "Risk in review Managing risk from the front line",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294,
  "pageNumber": 13,
  "pageCount": 29,
  "prevPage": 12,
  "nextPage": 14,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "The chart is a grouped bar chart comparing two segments across 12 categories.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_grouped"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-f44394ca4c72/13",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-f44394ca4c72",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-f44394ca4c72.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-f44394ca4c72#slide-13",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "As a group, Front Liners are also more likely than other respondents to say they manage effectively across all 12 areas of risk that we surveyed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa4-712e-8323-d54abc175b5d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.276,
        "y": 0.235
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Grouped bar chart showing risk management effectiveness by category for Front Liners vs All others",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3bf1654d-6f72-4f83-abae-24543cfd0946",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.16,
        "x": 0.795,
        "y": 0.258
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Front Liners vs All others",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d1061d59-881d-4263-8ed1-daf8b07d3404",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Risk management effectiveness",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa4-712e-8323-d8179449f0f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.225,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.203
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "As a group, Front Liners are also more likely than other respondents to say they manage effectively across all 12 areas of risk that we surveyed. In some risk areas, the differences are stark. Front Liners’ responses on the topic of past risk events suggest their confidence is based on records of success: A significantly larger percentage of Front Liners reported having addressed negative risk events. This held true across all 12 causes of business disruption that we surveyed. Among companies that suffered disruptions caused by changes in business models or strategy, 66% of Front Liners reported recovering effectively versus 48% of other respondents. Among companies disrupted by operational risk, 63% of Front Liners reported effective recovery compared with 46% of non-Front Liners. And among companies that suffered business disruptions caused by geopolitical upheaval, 56% of Front Liners said their companies recovered effectively versus 39% of other respondents.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "95b429f3-9b92-4672-a975-edcfcd92868d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.018,
        "w": 0.315,
        "x": 0.276,
        "y": 0.203
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Front Liners manage risks more effectively",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4252d73c-5a47-48bb-994d-a6d7ab145d23",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "f919cadb-c545-4863-8fca-2afcf0e1c2a2",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "The document presents the solution of a front-line led risk management ecosystem",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "3b0d88c5-c3f2-40a6-8a1e-981e0e611a84",
      "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of arguments and evidence to support the solution",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To demonstrate the benefits of front-line led risk management",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}