{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5",
  "docSlug": "606681d272d16554",
  "documentTitle": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 15,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 42,
  "notes": "The slide includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating the current section is 'RPA Uses by Insurers'.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "process_diagram"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Life insurers are considering the use of RPA within more actuarial processes than P&C insurers.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-17040603590d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.93,
        "x": 0.036,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stacked bar chart showing RPA adoption status across 14 actuarial processes.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8fe0973a-9c84-47d4-8caa-0193d7b9c852",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.42,
        "y": 0.735
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Currently Using, Considering, Not Considering",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "02c5d535-d98b-4a3b-9b22-34553f3395d7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "RPA adoption status",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b38a-1a379e61a551",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.93,
        "x": 0.036,
        "y": 0.815
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "Navigation breadcrumb: Foreword, Key Takeaways, Survey Overview, RPA Uses by Insurers, RPA Uses by Case, Impact on Offshoring, Tools and Governance, Skills Assessment and Development, What's Next: IPA",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "unclassified",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1f7e12c7-3349-433f-9eed-bc26dbf1f5ba",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.93,
        "x": 0.036,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Life insurers are considering the use of RPA within more actuarial processes than P&C insurers. Product design and new product additions in validation models are the two main areas where the least respondents are considering the use of RPA.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3760db4e-5e54-40d8-94c9-72990fef2846",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.53,
        "x": 0.036,
        "y": 0.058
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0c6b814b-0fa8-45ad-ab3f-3bea28822471",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9b43-7415-a93c-41d2723fcbd6",
      "evidence": "Stacked segments labelled with adoption status.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9aee-726d-93e6-452ef881406f",
      "evidence": "100% stacked bar to compare adoption stages across processes.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9b19-76c6-bdab-dd4f28a6133f",
      "evidence": "Same chart template repeats across p6-10 for cross-category comparison.",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9b6e-758e-b3fb-f44b332f1d16",
      "evidence": "Callout: Life vs P&C contrast surfaced as the takeaway.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33",
      "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}