{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5",
  "docSlug": "606681d272d16554",
  "documentTitle": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 15,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 27,
  "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal stacked bar chart to visualize survey data regarding RPA adoption.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "process_diagram"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any risk management process and the majority are not considering its use in any of the processes cited below.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-d97d83fa55df",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.2,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stacked bar chart showing 'Currently Using', 'Considering', and 'Not Considering' for 9 risk management processes.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f08dc1df-f24d-4cc8-9209-9aedc8c99a4f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.82
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Navigation bar showing the current section as 'RPA Uses by Case'.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9aa5aa3a-6b75-4084-8614-8ba5ddc48b55",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "RPA adoption status: 91%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b389-df75867d1514",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Risk Management Processes. No P&C insurer is currently using RPA in any risk management process and the majority are not considering its use in any of the processes cited below. Asset liability analysis is the area where life insurers are most readily considering the use of RPA.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "02843992-bc16-4e80-a5ae-733bd81b6e92",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Use of RPA within different functions in the insurer (continued)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "91963ed5-47bb-4d03-bb62-37fb0e0da83f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9d43-755a-bb8e-d5ef4d9a0016",
      "evidence": "Stacked bar across risk-management processes.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9d6d-76c9-8c76-c9afb7a17564",
      "evidence": "Closes the p6-10 small-multiples sweep.",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-9d97-71ad-b3c2-8ae25d39b8e7",
      "evidence": "Callout: '91% / no P&C insurer is currently using RPA in risk'.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33",
      "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}