{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003",
  "docSlug": "ee398100b87a5d80",
  "documentTitle": "Pharmacy Management Case Study",
  "authorId": "OliverWyman",
  "authorName": "Oliver Wyman",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.714,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 8,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 2,
  "notes": "Uses a standard Situation-Approach-Impact structure.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-839df80d8003#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Increased adherence opportunities resulted in potential upside of $20 M",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d9f1-764a-82e9-05e30205866d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.66,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Key impacts achieved",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "40279abf-31d7-44e5-bf1b-3b276a96cd19",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Oliver Wyman approach",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5c45c3c9-9cd6-4a4e-8203-838fb79692dc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Client situation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "82d23156-3658-4167-b5a9-dc09730a7461",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "National retail pharmacy chain is challenged to identify which PBMs DIR programs should warrant additional focus. Pharmacy chain required strategy for potential upside based on tiers achieved in PBM pay for performance programs, existing tiers, and analysis of current payments. Retailer required additional analysis on level of effort and corresponding ROI to enhance their P4P program payouts.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8ca518a8-c32e-48d7-a366-7e731c596ceb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.66,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Developed a detailed understanding of contract performance for the largest PBM programs. Identified opportunity to improve quality for pharmacy adherence programs for 15 K health plan members. Increased adherence opportunities resulted in potential upside of $20 M",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "98ab1acd-a680-4f00-89c3-d8609eef4bcf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Conducted detailed analysis of Top 5 PBM current P4P programs, focusing on program elements, corresponding results, tiers achieved and payouts. Assessed ROI tied to moving up in payout tiers as well as risk of moving down. Assessment of payment opportunities/risks were performed at an operational level to identify highly targeted opportunities to improve performance and corresponding increases in payments (e.g., within a PBM’s network, specific to this measure, X many members should be contacted to convert at Y% to achieve $Z return per member)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b141436e-2a5c-4886-b7b8-729c373060e6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "potential upside: $20 M",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d9f1-764a-82e9-0bc1c94a5a69",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Conducted analysis of DIR contract performance, tiering, level of effort, and upside potential to determine which PBM DIR programs warranted additional focus",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "description",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "49ee8a6d-eb38-4747-ab79-0362e93a525a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "NATIONAL RETAIL PHARMACY CHAIN DIR CONTRACT ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE, TIERING, LEVEL OF EFFORT AND UPSIDE POTENTIAL",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "da9b3d56-18ce-4a56-9614-f1b24b183453",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "potential upside",
      "numberRaw": "$20 M",
      "numberKind": "money",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "Increased adherence opportunities resulted in potential upside of $20 M",
      "numberScale": "m",
      "numberValue": 20,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": "$"
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "before-after-bridge",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f8643890-cf0e-41c8-9cf7-b5f38e3377e9",
      "evidence": "Situation-Approach-Impact structure",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "bd4df1d6-3a59-48fe-8e55-04ce47bea7b3",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck provides quantified ROI and contract analysis.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "e93c630a-d995-40cb-8123-0e3a10150eca",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a logical chain of arguments, from situation to solution and impact.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "How can pharmacy management be optimized?",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}