{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-0d795dbdf533",
  "docSlug": "d51b2ab5e2448e31",
  "documentTitle": "Medical Affairs Japan",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 20,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "The chart uses a split-bar approach to compare 'Quality' vs 'Quantity' metrics against three outcome variables.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_horizontal"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-0d795dbdf533/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-0d795dbdf533",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-0d795dbdf533.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-0d795dbdf533#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Correlation matrix of MSL quality/quantity vs satisfaction, influence, and recommendation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ba2cb6dd-cd46-45e4-838e-b9d70ec96af9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Correlation coefficient: 0.66",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3be-700b-83d6-d1d0331eeaf7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "SOURCE: Japan MAPES 2016",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fa25ea9f-ba77-481b-a0e0-9a0ad186d886",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Correlation between quality and quantity of the MSL activities and overall impact of a pharma company. Percentage of respondents per case; n =460",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "72f7c067-a530-436f-ba0b-3833f2eb87bf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Quality of MSL interaction have clear correlation with the satisfaction and scientific influence of the company",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "435c879e-b19b-416f-aefe-8782e253626a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Correlation coefficient",
      "numberRaw": "0.66",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Quality of MSL interaction have clear correlation with the satisfaction and scientific influence of the company",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 0.66,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "43040a46-b229-4b19-a2da-fc1bfa18a780",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Slides 6-20 outline the proposed solution and approach",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "cbb620d5-d399-4e67-988f-39c95d28f094",
      "evidence": "Slides 3-10 imply that not addressing the growing demands will have negative consequences",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the consequences of not adapting to changing demands on Medical Affairs",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "bbb58890-3cd6-4cbe-a616-134af504b21d",
      "evidence": "Slides 6-20 provide a clear explanation of the 'why', 'what', and 'how'",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Explain the 'why', 'what', and 'how' of Medical Affairs as the 'Third Pillar'",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}