{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394",
  "docSlug": "ec730d1778e1684b",
  "documentTitle": "Technology Mineral Criticality",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 28,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "impact_sizing",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "The chart is a waterfall-style representation of cumulative impact.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table",
    "bar_chart_stacked"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.09,
        "x": 0.76,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing cumulative impact from 5% to 22%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "207c7083-3845-41da-8659-ebd5077b4656",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Share of 2016 mining revenue: 22%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3be-700b-83e2-d6f7bb5a33fe",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1 McKinsey mine digitisation model, based on copper mine at middle of cost curve. SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute research on Internet of Things",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "994809ed-1940-44fa-a57f-b9fcf228d5f8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Levers and Descriptions for Operations management, Improved equipment maintenance, IoT enabled equipment selection, IoT enabled process optimisation, IoT enabled R&D, Health and safety",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec1f4a76-1bdb-4e98-8a42-1d37e1b94cc0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Successful implementation of technology could generate up to 22% of additional value from productivity improvement for all stakeholders",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3e20d87e-de84-4af6-b0ff-e8c8d9ea2120",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Share of 2016 mining revenue",
      "numberRaw": "22%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Successful implementation of technology could generate up to 22% of additional value from productivity improvement for all stakeholders",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 22,
      "metricFamily": "share_penetration",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3436b18b-9e68-4028-aa8d-b7f117da06ea",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall: Waterfall chart showing cumulative impact from 5% to 22%",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "804075f0-0529-484c-8b05-eabf35d507ec",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "The deck presents strategies for meeting demand booms, including technology adoption and productivity improvement.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "9a9fd096-3359-4e5c-a889-03b109395669",
      "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the importance of investing in technology to meet demand booms and avoid negative consequences.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the consequences of not investing in technology and meeting demand booms",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Jobs To Be Done",
      "slug": "53-jobs-to-be-done",
      "bestFor": "Product innovation, market entry, competitive positioning",
      "matchId": "18432107-9633-44d2-81e0-f444b10e9665",
      "evidence": "The deck discusses the implementation of technology and its impact on mineral demand.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To identify the jobs to be done in implementing technology and meeting demand booms",
      "structure": "The Customer's Job -> Current Solutions (Hired/Fired) -> Unmet Needs -> Our Solution Fit",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Reframe the problem around what the customer is trying to accomplish, not what they're buying"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}