{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "impact_sizing",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "The slide explains the methodology behind the prudence adjustment (best-of-two approach) and lists factors that could increase the potential.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "waterfall_chart",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Det samlede effektiviseringspotentiale på 7,1 DKK mia. skal ses som et konservativt skøn, idet der i beregningen af potentialet er indlagt et forsigtighedshensyn på 1,2 DKK mia.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3b9-7789-9919-dfb2765705a5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing 8.3 (gross), -1.2 (adjustment), 7.1 (net)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8a253401-a433-4b7d-919d-1be3fd4cf3f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Beskrivelse af forsigtighedshensyn: Explains the 1.2 DKK billion adjustment based on best-of-two approach (DEA/SFA) and lists upside factors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7006e65b-6fb4-4eab-8f98-f098bf26dc51",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "DKK mia.: 7,1",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3b9-7789-9919-e11b13c54713",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "KILDE: Energitilsynet; Forsyningssekretariatet; Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "167db55e-6b68-4a3b-a818-53e6ba760fbb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Effektiviseringspotentialet skal ses som et konservativt estimat, idet der er indlagt et forsigtighedshensyn på 1,2 DKK mia.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cc7069fe-9e4b-4609-a3dd-da1429aaee2c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "KONKLUSION",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b2b97c7-b959-42e8-8178-939a88bb756c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "DKK mia.",
      "numberRaw": "7,1",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Effektiviseringspotentialet skal ses som et konservativt estimat, idet der er indlagt et forsigtighedshensyn på 1,2 DKK mia.",
      "calloutText": "Det samlede effektiviseringspotentiale på 7,1 DKK mia. skal ses som et konservativt skøn, idet der i beregningen af potentialet er indlagt et forsigtighedshensyn på 1,2 DKK mia.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 7.1,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "306146fd-1744-4788-9804-c9731aab8337",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall: Waterfall chart showing 8.3 (gross), -1.2 (adjustment), 7.1 (net)",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall-chart",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f560baf6-1651-4805-9414-0d3524cc82c8",
      "evidence": "Visual representation of gross potential minus adjustment to net potential",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608",
      "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}