{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 51,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 50,
  "nextPage": 52,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'best-of-two' model (DEA and SFA) to calculate efficiency potential, excluding fuel costs and including heat loss value.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "line_chart",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/51",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-51",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Effektiviseringsanalysen viser et direkte potentiale på 1.935 DKKm svarende til 20,8% af de samlede omkostninger i sektoren.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b018-cc9332dbb331",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Direct efficiency potential comparison 2012/13 vs 2014",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f855885-fd7b-4bb9-ad02-fe0e208cc0c4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.4,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Efficiency potential (Unweighted vs Weighted)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8838d243-064a-40a0-b672-f8b8a800bdde",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Efficiency scores (Transport vs Production)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "95e4284f-c840-42a6-b0bb-97fd93d9c524",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "KILDE: Moderniseret regulering i fjernvarmesektoren, Den tværministerielle arbejdsgruppe (2015); Benchmarking af fjernvarme, Copenhagen Economics (2015); Data fra Energitilsynets priseftervisninger; Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "89dfbedf-ecf1-482a-af39-ee99c54721c9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.33,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Conclusions on potential growth and drivers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "256603fd-341b-4909-a2e1-fb5c4f7dc4e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.33,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.48
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Sensitivity analysis of the potential",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "436fb909-7b36-4d66-ab3f-cf6bd3fc89c5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Efficiency potential (DKKm): 1.935 DKKm",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b018-d07bd7f6cc09",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Det direkte potentiale i fjernvarmesektoren opgøres i 2014 til ~1.935 DKKm",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "32a14130-8e37-4dea-8058-2c6e5cae4e6d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Efficiency potential (DKKm)",
      "numberRaw": "1.935 DKKm",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Det direkte potentiale i fjernvarmesektoren opgøres i 2014 til ~1.935 DKKm",
      "calloutText": "Effektiviseringsanalysen viser et direkte potentiale på 1.935 DKKm svarende til 20,8% af de samlede omkostninger i sektoren.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 1.935,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "DEA-SFA Best-of-two",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "6824ea8e-5056-46a1-9398-4362a31fc6d9",
      "evidence": "Mentioned in chart labels and text as the methodology for calculating efficiency scores.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 60,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "b4d717e7-3337-4c26-af4b-809d56477c6c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document outlines various initiatives and regulatory changes to address the barriers.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 60,
      "from": 41,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "38e66459-da51-4138-b562-c585054351a0",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the potential consequences of not addressing the barriers.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "To outline the consequences of not addressing the barriers.",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}