{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 35,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 34,
  "nextPage": 36,
  "slideType": "initiative_list",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide outlines the initiative, its pros/cons, and the prerequisites for effective regulation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "callout_box",
    "comparison_table",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/35",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-35",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Ved at samle investeringsgodkendelserne hos en uvildig myndighed sikres desuden størst mulig koncentration og opbygning af kompetencer til vurdering af investeringer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b018-7b7280fa81ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Forudsætninger for effektiv regulering: Valg af myndighed, Klare retningslinjer for investeringer, Klare retningslinjer for kriterier",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "98115c50-6dff-47c4-9eac-be68c6869144",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Kvalificering af initiativ: Fordele (Sikrer bedst mulige kompetencer...) vs Potentielle ulemper (Fjerner beslutninger som har implikationer for den lokale planlægning...)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ca0ade11-2d48-41df-904e-0249b1f63029",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Projektbekendtgørelsen tilsiger, at selskabernes investeringer i fjernvarmenettet skal godkendes af kommunen med baggrund i en samfundsøkonomisk beregning. I vandsektoren er det muligt at gennemføre en række investeringer, uden at der sker en uvildig godkendelse af disse (fx et spildevandsselskabers investeringer i skybrudsløsninger). For at sikre den bedst mulige vurdering af potentielle investeringer (test af samfundsmæssige beregninger, business case etc.) samt undgå en sammenblanding mellem investering og politik (fx ved at den kommunale ejer pålægger spildevandsselskabet investeringer i skybrudssikring), kan godkendelsen af sådanne investeringer lægges hos en uvildig myndighed. Ved at samle investeringsgodkendelserne hos en uvildig myndighed sikres desuden størst mulig koncentration og opbygning af kompetencer til vurdering af investeringer",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4e5ebf8a-aaf7-4a16-a901-3d20ba4968c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "KILDE: Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4b7ac4a1-6e0b-460d-8c24-9afd9285c729",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "INITIATIVER",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71ee1beb-3774-4f82-839c-a9883191161b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "15 Krav om investeringsgodkendelser hos en uvildig myndighed kan potentielt styrke efterprøvningen af investeringsforudsætninger og business cases",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7e6f33e5-052f-49ba-8181-e1231244a58d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 21,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e",
      "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}