{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "initiative_list",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a regulatory initiative, balancing benefits and risks while listing technical requirements.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "For at sikre tilstrækkelige incitamenter til at effektivisere på hele omkostningsbasen, bør der ske et skifte til en indtægtsrammeregulering, hvor effektiviseringskrav baseres på hele omkostningsbasen (dvs. TOTEX-benchmarking).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b018-5f96808c1abb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Kvalificering af initiativ: Fordele og Potentielle ulemper",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9bc74471-6716-4d07-aa7e-fc4f42d1684a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Forudsætninger for effektiv regulering: 5-point checklist",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ef4ab77c-c28b-453a-8b58-51dbfd578fd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "For at sikre tilstrækkelige incitamenter til at effektivisere på hele omkostningsbasen, bør der ske et skifte til en indtægtsrammeregulering, hvor effektiviseringskrav baseres på hele omkostningsbasen (dvs. TOTEX-benchmarking).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8b34c852-6d0a-4636-8b26-7c7466ed3f26",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "KILDE: Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "636b814f-3719-4a56-98f2-2c960c34ffa7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "2.1 Indtægtsrammeregulering med TOTEX-benchmarking kan incentivere til effektivisering af hele omkostningsbasen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "895ec618-44d1-4cc4-8b57-35f7c64144f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6f7e61b6-72ea-458c-ae74-daee4fba1f79",
      "evidence": "List of bullets describing initiative",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "pros-cons-analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4881aae0-30d2-4475-b983-f1640bdd1e88",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures content into 'Fordele' (Pros) and 'Potentielle ulemper' (Cons).",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "d6c3814c-1c1c-4dc2-8130-08fdc142df8a",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document presents data and case studies to support its findings.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 21,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "fafb0b55-a09c-4623-a52d-6c1b1da5e89e",
      "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle framework to present its findings.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To provide evidence and proof of the potential for efficiency improvements.",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}