{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 226,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 225,
  "nextPage": 227,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide compares two different DEA-based models to explain why their potential estimates differ.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "comparison_table",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/226",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-226",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Nedenfor er forskelle mellem de to modeller beskrevet og det er anskueliggjort, at potentialerne i de to typer beregninger har samme størrelsesorden.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b028-b3b8bb6e5c93",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Direkte effektiviseringspotentiale i affaldsforbrændingssektoren",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2199e73d-b968-414a-a01b-b57edb545b7a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Incentive (2015) has calculated the 2025 efficiency potential in the waste incineration sector using the 'Market Model'. To ensure a comparable baseline, the current analysis uses total costs, making direct comparison difficult. Below are the differences described.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7a14743c-ddf5-4dc1-ac49-32f7e0a0999e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "DKKm: 665",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b028-b757ca54a1bc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "KILDE: Dansk Affaldsforening, Dansk Industri og Dansk Energi (2015): Benchmarking af Affaldssektoren (data fra 2014) - Forbrænding; Incentive (2015): Resultater fra Markedsmodellen; Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e8ab9432-1edb-4e4f-9fce-b7cd4e9eb7d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of Incentive vs McKinsey methodologies across four categories: Grundmodel, Overkapacitet, Administration, Fremskrivning.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2bdbc995-cc13-4c88-b5d7-a6708491841d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Sammenligning af modelresultater med \"Markedsmodellen\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9f59c3b3-731f-45dc-9d85-3881e07e2365",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "DKKm",
      "numberRaw": "665",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "Nedenfor er forskelle mellem de to modeller beskrevet og det er anskueliggjort, at potentialerne i de to typer beregninger har samme størrelsesorden.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 665,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "10b75183-b0f7-4be6-8dd7-3119af6bcda2",
      "evidence": "Comparison table of Incentive vs McKinsey methodologies across four categories: Grundmodel, Overkapacitet, Administration, Fremskrivning.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9db6845a-ecf0-4c22-8ddb-86f56572d69d",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a side-by-side comparison table and bar chart to contrast two methodologies.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}