{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7",
  "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 170,
  "pageCount": 234,
  "prevPage": 169,
  "nextPage": 171,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide explains the technical approach to benchmarking, comparing DEA (non-parametric) and SFA (parametric) models.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "bullet_list",
    "line_chart",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/170",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-170",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Givet DEA- og SFA-modellernes fordele og ulemper, kan det være svært at vælge mellem de to, og som konsekvens heraf, kan det være nyttigt at benytte en kombination af de to modeller.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3ba-7150-b023-3eef247362f7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Illustration af benchmarkingmodeller",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scatter",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "54a28d57-f397-43e0-9484-21b98952e4c5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "DEA- og SFA-modellerne er bedste praksis-modeller, hvor den grundlæggende idé er at sammenligne selskabers effektivitet, for på denne baggrund at kunne identificere et effektiviseringspotentiale",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3a2f6462-4f4c-4221-ba7c-eb660c98169c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.48,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Beskrivelse af benchmarkingmodeller: Benchmarkingmodellerne producerer en produktionsfront, som dermed definerer den effektive front i en given sektor, samt en effektivitetsscore for hvert selskab",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c26a0df9-331c-464c-94e0-a552ffea73b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "For at kunne beregne det direkte effektiviseringspotentiale i forsyningssektoren, anvendes som udgangspunkt to typer af benchmarkingmodeller, navnlig Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) og Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e9ec0ad7-3c6e-4cf3-9593-ee4dc0a6d884",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "KILDE: Bogetoft (2012): Performance Benchmarking – Measuring and Managing Performance; McKinsey; Team analyse",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec84f64e-fbfb-44e8-9872-bb922f122e49",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "METODE: DIREKTE POTENTIALE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fbec89a5-0f5b-4468-b28f-7e628197e498",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Det direkte potentiale estimeres på baggrund af eksisterende DEA- og SFA-benchmarkingmodeller",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b418962a-8cc3-4ae8-aeef-a4a258acfb7f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "DEA/SFA Benchmarking",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "7852b404-fa75-4507-9e36-7d28e54edfc1",
      "evidence": "Explicit mention of Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}