{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5",
  "docSlug": "87a04ea9b7ff0d81",
  "documentTitle": "Affordable Housing Challenge Blueprint",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 43,
  "pageCount": 49,
  "prevPage": 42,
  "nextPage": 44,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparative framework to evaluate different national approaches to residential energy retrofitting.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5/43",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5#slide-43",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Before/After energy bill comparison charts for the three programs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "26ebda78-2a15-46bd-b22a-71f1039bbad6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1 USD 580 annual savings for 20 years, compared with initial investment of USD 5,600; 2 Ministry of Housing, Urban, and Rural Development and the Ministry of Finance; 3 Assuming average home size 50 sqm, 1 household/ home, and 182 mn sqm retrofitted in 2006-2010; 4 Amount of energy bill unavailable. Percentage savings based on MoHURD evaluation, 2009",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7515acd7-c1d7-4166-9ad0-d6f3133b2bfa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Energy expenditure reduction: 10-30%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3bb-700a-9db0-107d6400272d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "SOURCE: US Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP); UK Warm Front Scheme Close out report; North China Policy for existing residential buildings; US Department of Energy (PNNL 2014); MGI Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "18a7444b-e32b-4a77-9d0f-95f2cf8acaa5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of WAP, Warm Front Scheme, and Existing Residential Building Retrofit across metrics like annual energy bill, households served, ROI, and operating model steps.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "85fed8af-2a5f-4bfd-a065-cdd280f0134f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Efficient energy saving measures reduce energy expenditures by 10-30%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3b081f62-1cbb-486d-86f1-563cef921a95",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Energy expenditure reduction",
      "numberRaw": "10-30%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Efficient energy saving measures reduce energy expenditures by 10-30%",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": -30,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Before-After-Bridge",
      "slug": "before-after-bridge",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8911cd77-516b-4a99-a5fb-39f730040365",
      "evidence": "Before/After energy bill comparison charts for the three programs.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d74d353d-9edc-43fc-a226-e33eb6527ba3",
      "evidence": "The slide compares three distinct national programs across identical operational and financial dimensions.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 49,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "8265bf01-78ee-477d-88a0-a9dae3cb65ea",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document presents impact sizing and case studies to support the proposed solutions.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}