{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-ccea3002e196",
  "docSlug": "ed1565329f7cd29d",
  "documentTitle": "Poverty Empowerment India",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 21,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "The chart highlights the leakage in social spending across different sectors (Food, NREGA, Education, Fuel, Health/Water/Sanitation).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "pie_chart",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-ccea3002e196/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-ccea3002e196",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-ccea3002e196.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-ccea3002e196#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "If subsidy delivery nationwide was as effective as in India's best performing states, 85 million more people would be above the official poverty line",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a89111a3-ee99-40b6-b3de-77f4e46f198f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "If subsidy delivery nationwide was as effective as in India’s best performing states, 85 million more people would be above the official poverty line",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3be-700b-83e5-f03be4aaca8a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.38,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Estimated efficiency/effectiveness of all-India government spending by sector",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71e3f6df-b04d-4139-92a4-9d491aa10f1f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "2011-12 government spending pie chart showing 50% leakage",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "pie",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4840072d-4dbc-4fc8-8788-d6da06a685d9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of spending reaching the people: 50%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-d3be-700b-83e5-f6cb21ea3340",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "SOURCE: NSSO, government fiscal statistics, MGI analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "caec88ac-26b2-40eb-88e5-fe99c99dcdb0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Government social spending is 6% of GDP but half of it does not benefit the people",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "56d8a27e-e924-4447-af6f-bb52d3bdce62",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Percentage of spending reaching the people",
      "numberRaw": "50%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Government social spending is 6% of GDP but half of it does not benefit the people",
      "calloutText": "If subsidy delivery nationwide was as effective as in India’s best performing states, 85 million more people would be above the official poverty line",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 50,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "0db7a929-c095-459e-b83f-07436986570a",
      "evidence": "The slide presents various charts to support the diagnosis.",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "fd4283b8-e829-47fe-981c-5219369ff4f0",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of inaction, including the historical reduction of the Empowerment Gap largely from higher incomes, and the ineffectiveness of government social spending.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 9,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "16022d46-445e-456c-ad28-88abe4a2dca7",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of inaction, including the historical reduction of the Empowerment Gap largely from higher incomes.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction and the need for change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}