{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e",
  "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 99,
  "pageCount": 129,
  "prevPage": 98,
  "nextPage": 100,
  "slideType": "pain_points",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "The chart uses a point-allocation methodology where interviewees distributed 100 points across barriers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/99",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-99",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Most significant barriers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "368b6fe2-d38c-4a3d-812b-02b3e1bc4dc4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1 Interviewees were given 100 points to allocate among 11 selected barriers and were asked to allocate them according to which barriers were most significant\n2 Added by interviewees\nSOURCE: Interviews",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "733625c4-8cf4-42ed-8844-2b4b40530a2f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Points allocated by interviewees: 28",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-cdeb-70a8-978a-787771557e38",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Interviewees identified 'pay back period too long,' 'not a business priority' and 'lack of information' as the most significant barriers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71f93c5b-d27a-4fc9-b6b4-7a609d9f803c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Points allocated by interviewees",
      "numberRaw": "28",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Interviewees identified ‘pay back period too long,’ ‘not a business priority’ and ‘lack of information’ as the most significant barriers",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 28,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "pain_points",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d8a62e0f-5d07-4d00-93cd-1666988ec416",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists barriers identified by interviewees.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 53,
      "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 108,
      "from": 99,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "0be058dc-e7b4-47ae-bca3-4d757000c5b4",
      "evidence": "The document mentions the costs of inaction and the benefits of electricity efficiency measures.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction on electricity efficiency measures",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}