{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e",
  "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 22,
  "pageCount": 129,
  "prevPage": 21,
  "nextPage": 23,
  "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 9,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 3x3 matrix to demonstrate sensitivity, highlighting that discount rate changes have a larger impact on abatement cost than CO2 price changes.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/22",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-22",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In reducing 1 TWh of electricity, the CO2 price benefit is less than the electricity price benefit, hence CO2 price has a lower impact than electricity price and also lower than discount rate",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07caf962-c7fd-4a49-97e2-d5407a359311",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "3x3 sensitivity matrix of abatement costs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "matrix-nxn",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "406dbe68-6590-4cbd-9dc4-8d32a6a198d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Average abatement cost (£/MWh): -181",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-cdeb-70a8-9783-0e5f5192f86d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1 Only the traded CO2 price is varied i.e., CO2 price associated with electricity. Non-traded CO2 price i.e., associated with gas is not varied. The demand response to higher/lower electricity prices or CO2 prices is not modelled.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3da4d79f-c6c9-41da-aa0b-db4a88466280",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Abatement cost is less sensitive to carbon price assumptions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2cec8a0e-c81c-44a7-8907-ed0331ab936e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Average abatement cost (£/MWh)",
      "numberRaw": "-181",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Abatement cost is less sensitive to carbon price assumptions",
      "calloutText": "In reducing 1 TWh of electricity, the CO2 price benefit is less than the electricity price benefit, hence CO2 price has a lower impact than electricity price and also lower than discount rate",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": -181,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "NxN matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-nxn",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6cb57d48-e3b9-435c-86a9-cc8e803ddaa2",
      "evidence": "chart/matrix-nxn: 3x3 sensitivity matrix of abatement costs",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "matrix-nxn",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d53f768f-9dcf-4aad-af84-017869be00a7",
      "evidence": "3x3 grid used to show sensitivity of abatement cost to two variables",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 77,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "02a14110-f7eb-4a8e-ad6c-56f071f97bab",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support the potential for electricity efficiency measures.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}