{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e",
  "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 108,
  "pageCount": 129,
  "prevPage": 107,
  "nextPage": 109,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/108",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-108",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.43,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Advantages: Provides transparent mechanism, multi-year commitment, supports retail competition, incorporates demand-response, allows locational requirements, facilitates market power monitoring.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7253cebf-e623-4579-8597-2d82536a3f60",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.43,
        "x": 0.51,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Disadvantages: High implementation costs, design risks, supplier risks/defaults, political backlash due to visible pricing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8d12d2ab-76ec-4950-87bc-bc58a8c42287",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: “Energy Efficiency as a resource in the ISO New England Forward Capacity Markets” report",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8996ae8f-ae9a-414a-aa67-bdb522f0f5db",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Advantages vs Disadvantages comparison",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ffe8f46a-f809-4a7c-a704-3a00f5750ebc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Advantages and disadvantages of energy markets with forward reserve requirements and centralised capacity markets",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "10682f22-d7ae-4b95-8d13-18ec0d9f925c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "c715562e-16ee-4021-9855-ffb57ae80cd4",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side list of advantages and disadvantages",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 53,
      "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 108,
      "from": 99,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "0be058dc-e7b4-47ae-bca3-4d757000c5b4",
      "evidence": "The document mentions the costs of inaction and the benefits of electricity efficiency measures.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction on electricity efficiency measures",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}