{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9",
  "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b",
  "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019",
  "authorId": "LEK",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 43,
  "pageCount": 178,
  "prevPage": 42,
  "nextPage": 44,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 120,
  "notes": "The table includes data for Australia, U.S., Denmark, UK, Canada, Germany, and Norway, broken down by specific regions or cities.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/43",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-43",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Note: * Data is compiled for different years (c.2014 to 2019) and sources due to limitations on data availability;** Number of landfills, resources recovery facilities and transfer stations based on either local permit database or Google map search; ^ National data for all waste utilised due to data availability; ^^ State-wide figures; ^^^ Household waste only. Source: NSW Local Government; Victorian Local Government; Queensland Local Government; Toronto Local Government; Metro Vancouver; Statistics Canada; Australian Bureau of Statistics; L.E.K. analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ee3c2ad-62a2-4bf5-b416-4c7dad6cb0ea",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Legend for Countries, States, and Cities",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "08d372e0-04b7-4fab-9b03-321505e22e52",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Per-capita HH waste volume",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-cdea-74d8-858e-1a0b26a23ce4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.19
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table comparing waste management metrics (per capita waste, recycling rate, landfill, waste to energy, facilities, population) across regions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "37f55a0e-76e4-4919-9951-e6ae3e20e3b8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "A number of potential comparators were reviewed at a regional level, to assess suitability as benchmarks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f2947a32-67ce-4545-a994-c1fd11d7caf8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Key waste management international comparators:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "12481172-a91a-4de2-b061-7e190bd06704",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 45,
      "from": 40,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "d677322c-d0d5-4a14-a4e3-e214808e1c8e",
      "evidence": "The document uses a MECE breakdown to analyze the waste supply chain and identify areas for improvement.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To identify key areas for improvement in the waste supply chain",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}