{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c",
  "docSlug": "48bf645da462e4e2",
  "documentTitle": "2022 Global Alternative Fund Survey",
  "authorId": "EY",
  "authorName": "EY",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 48,
  "pageCount": 53,
  "prevPage": 47,
  "nextPage": 49,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 9,
  "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart for impact assessment and two donut charts for year-over-year comparison of investment decisions based on ESG policies.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "photo",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "donut_chart"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c/48",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c#slide-48",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Some 60% of investors stated that these policies were at least moderately important to their investment decision-making, with more than 35% stating these were important or critically important.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-c23d-70a9-9ea8-eace5930e3d0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.51,
        "x": 0.355,
        "y": 0.285
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Investors: What impact does a manager's corporate policies that factor ESG considerations to the non-investment activities of the manager have on your decision to invest or remain invested?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c8b57559-cc8e-46cc-b65f-565ba433eb3e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.51,
        "x": 0.355,
        "y": 0.53
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Investors: Have you decided not to invest with a manager because you found their ESG policies inadequate?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "donut",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ed357276-ffe5-449e-8c86-a9bde087e4bb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.277,
        "w": 0.277,
        "x": 0.053,
        "y": 0.148
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5c0d0f1f-1379-41ac-ba3e-9bba78947b72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Investor decision impact: 26%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-c23d-70a9-9ea8-ef0ac8e3f0d4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.38,
        "w": 0.267,
        "x": 0.063,
        "y": 0.443
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "While managers continue to evolve how they manage their corporate ESG polices and messaging, investors' focus on this area continues to rise. Some 60% of investors stated that these policies were at least moderately important to their investment decision-making, with more than 35% stating these were important or critically important. In 2021, 20% of investors made the decision to not invest with a manager because of inadequate ESG policies. This rose to 26% in 2022. These statistics should ring alarms for managers who aren't taking investors' ESG demands seriously. They should also serve as a warning for other managers to not get complacent. ESG demands continue to be highly evolving, and what may have been appropriate to an investor in the past may no longer be adequate. It is important for firm leaders to continue to push the envelope on ESG policies, data, reporting and transparency.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "12b679ab-e7da-482e-bddc-bc9837994c48",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.379,
        "y": 0.148
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Managers continue to evolve on corporate ESG policies; investor focus also still growing",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bb58acf7-65a1-4608-ae47-ff20d7de9bf9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Investor decision impact",
      "numberRaw": "26%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Managers continue to evolve on corporate ESG policies; investor focus also still growing",
      "calloutText": "Some 60% of investors stated that these policies were at least moderately important to their investment decision-making, with more than 35% stating these were important or critically important.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 26,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-8e3f-741c-b5ca-4782e64c3bad",
      "evidence": "title 'managers continue to evolve; investor focus growing'",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-8e60-74df-a7a7-beab3ae150f7",
      "evidence": "100% stacked bar plus two donut charts",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-8e81-747d-81cb-ac1b3a99a74b",
      "evidence": "2021 vs 2022 trend contrast",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "beatId": "019de8c2-7d9f-70ae-a131-bcf4b5b73abc",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Regulatory readiness data, ESG policy adoption rates",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "beatId": "019de8c2-7e46-7008-98fc-a3371bdc3cb6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Regulatory and ESG sections frame manager response actions",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-7f0f-7480-8d8e-363777cecfc1",
      "evidence": "Regulatory cost framing (p43-45) vs increasing manager ESG adoption and investor pressure (p46-48)",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Contrast regulatory burden with industry's emerging ESG response",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}