{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c",
  "docSlug": "48bf645da462e4e2",
  "documentTitle": "2022 Global Alternative Fund Survey",
  "authorId": "EY",
  "authorName": "EY",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 42,
  "pageCount": 53,
  "prevPage": 41,
  "nextPage": 43,
  "slideType": "section_divider",
  "function": "establish_context",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "The slide uses a large number '6' to denote the section number. The text provides a narrative summary of industry survey data regarding ESG compliance readiness and investor sentiment.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "big_number",
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c/42",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-0e41e604268c#slide-42",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "As ESG-related and private fund regulations and proposals increase, the alternative fund industry needs to prepare for compliance.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-c23d-70a9-9ea8-4b51f6c9f6a3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In addition, the SEC's increased climate disclosure proposal for public companies has contributed to an overall trend of increased investor scrutiny of managers' ESG policies, with 50% of managers reporting increased pressure to change their approach to ESG. In response, 57% of managers are developing corporate ESG policies and 53% are implementing a governance structure to set policy and embed ESG into their investment decisions. Meeting investor ESG policy and reporting requirements is gaining significance, for 26% of investors decided in 2022 not to invest with a manager because of inadequate ESG policies, five-percentage-point gain from 2021. This increase should serve as a warning for managers to take investors' ESG demands seriously. Managers who neglect this trend may lose out on investor interest and capital allocations.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8535d915-79b8-414b-a44f-7a5dbd117f1d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "As ESG-related and private fund regulations and proposals increase, the alternative fund industry needs to prepare for compliance. Sixty-five percent of alternative managers report that their compliance and reporting infrastructure is well prepared and they are aware of the gaps that need to be addressed, but 19% believe their infrastructure needs upgrading and another 16% have yet to perform a gap analysis. With the cost of compliance disproportionately impacting smaller and midsized firms, they may need to consider outsourcing to help fulfill their regulatory burden.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f6932471-17e7-4eb3-b8ed-8a6d88bdc09b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "6",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8f0602c8-5223-475b-80a4-62fa51a5624d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Regulatory climate and strategic priorities",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "91bd4e04-36d4-4b9a-b1e3-8a69b1bed3aa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-8c8d-719d-95b7-eb4b566ae409",
      "evidence": "loop 6 first page: regulatory burden vs ESG-action contrast",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-8c6c-756c-be8b-de8377e3f452",
      "evidence": "section divider with large '6' and theme photo",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "beatId": "019de8c2-7d9f-70ae-a131-bcf4b5b73abc",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Regulatory readiness data, ESG policy adoption rates",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "beatId": "019de8c2-7e46-7008-98fc-a3371bdc3cb6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Regulatory and ESG sections frame manager response actions",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 48,
      "from": 42,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019de8c2-7f0f-7480-8d8e-363777cecfc1",
      "evidence": "Regulatory cost framing (p43-45) vs increasing manager ESG adoption and investor pressure (p46-48)",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Contrast regulatory burden with industry's emerging ESG response",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}