{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-a5c8f404e936",
  "docSlug": "0eecd7debfaa9618",
  "documentTitle": "The future of M&A 2022 M&A Trends Survey",
  "authorId": "Deloitte",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 19,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 18,
  "nextPage": 20,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 16,
  "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare 5 industry sectors across 4 survey questions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_grouped"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-a5c8f404e936/19",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-a5c8f404e936",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-a5c8f404e936.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-a5c8f404e936#slide-19",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "More than 70% of responding organizations report that they incorporate ESG metrics into target valuations and have re-evaluated their portfolio through the lens of ESG.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba8c-7422-8537-585c69ad3c50",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.47,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Please rate your agreement with the following: (Corporate only, by industry)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "498a0bc6-6a58-40ba-94d3-2fd53751379f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Agreement rate: 77%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba8c-7422-8537-5f291cee3c6c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.415,
        "x": 0.038,
        "y": 0.295
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) has become a more prominent factor in the way customers and society evaluate companies. What about potential acquirers? More than 70% of responding organizations report that they incorporate ESG metrics into target valuations and have re-evaluated their portfolio through the lens of ESG. In spite of incorporating ESG metrics, the same number also agree that ESG remains a challenge for their organizations. Many companies struggle to balance it within their overall organizational structures. Anecdotally, to date it has more often been a boardroom topic than one management has spent time on, but that may be changing. Nevertheless, 54% of survey respondents said the ESG focus would drive more M&A deal activity, not less. Fifteen percent of respondents indicated ESG and sustainable purpose elements were drivers in increased or decreased interest in foreign markets, ranking them as the fourth most important element after access to technology, market expansion, and product or market diversification. As the accompanying chart illustrates, Energy, Resources & Industrials companies have a keener focus on these issues than those in other sectors we surveyed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d1ce41f9-18fc-4a1b-89c7-8b3d62267bcc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.375,
        "x": 0.038,
        "y": 0.215
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Behaving the way to value: ESG in M&A",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "de02776e-eb7d-41b7-9dc8-6e41ce7db23f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.212,
        "x": 0.038,
        "y": 0.065
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Beyond the basics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6ce91eef-ff74-489a-b6c5-ad8a9373166a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Agreement rate",
      "numberRaw": "77%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Behaving the way to value: ESG in M&A",
      "calloutText": "More than 70% of responding organizations report that they incorporate ESG metrics into target valuations and have re-evaluated their portfolio through the lens of ESG.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 77,
      "metricFamily": "survey_sentiment",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "8c3966c9-6448-4f35-bdf6-a80bdc01bc6b",
      "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
      "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
      "beatName": "Satisfaction",
      "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction",
      "evidence": "Beyond the basics and transformation and restructuring",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 13,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "838d8ee9-53e6-4132-ac21-c1cf6e415211",
      "evidence": "Beyond the basics and transformation and restructuring",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Cost of inaction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}