{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-3c235d40234a",
  "docSlug": "0a19908f7f561ffc",
  "documentTitle": "Everest Group CPG Services",
  "authorId": "Cognizant",
  "authorName": "Everest Group",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 15,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a vertical gradient bar to represent priority levels for various sourcing criteria.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "subtitle_text",
    "icon_grid",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-3c235d40234a/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-3c235d40234a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-3c235d40234a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-3c235d40234a#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Enterprises highlight experience, market credibility, and domain and technical expertise as the leading factors in their sourcing decisions, apart from fundamental price competitiveness.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba89-733e-97f8-0e4d692b6f3d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.02,
        "x": 0.048,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Priority gradient from High to Low",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "85683c79-ae42-42d8-8908-e0755e7dfbd7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.048,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Relevant experience, Expertise, Market perception, Attractive pricing, IPs and partnerships, Previous experience, Delivery footprint",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "977e812a-f07e-48d5-a614-eb1e59ebd65a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.048,
        "y": 0.145
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Enterprises highlight experience, market credibility, and domain and technical expertise as the leading factors in their sourcing decisions, apart from fundamental price competitiveness",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "954549e6-ebc2-4ebf-b343-9b05835dba8a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.647,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Buyers demand consistent delivery, understanding of their system, and effective knowledge transfer to ensure continuity across large projects and rotating talent. Providers with niche or specialized technology expertise are preferred over generalists for complex, integration-heavy environments, with IPs and partnerships enhancing buyer confidence. Buyers prioritize flexibility, cross-functional support, and proactiveness – pricing matters when it complements these capabilities. Enterprises expect embedded teams that integrate quickly and can adapt to shifting timelines, resource gaps, and changing business needs. IPs and partnerships have been steadily gaining importance as selection criteria over the last few years.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fdcc022f-a602-4063-bf49-9dc06adad842",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.048,
        "y": 0.098
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Key buyer considerations",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fba44ddd-9479-4a77-a31d-bd155f44ed72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "717fbe62-68e3-4df0-9de8-57f1344ea575",
      "evidence": "list/bullet: Relevant experience, Expertise, Market perception, Attractive pricing, IPs and partnerships, Previous experience, Delivery footprint",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "47c0ba85-4c58-4e80-972d-07ef875d747f",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Key buyer considerations and key takeaways",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "036a7aeb-f30f-4948-abbd-f0d609d62aff",
      "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of information that leads to key takeaways",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Understand the PEAK Matrix assessment and its implications",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}