{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
  "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
  "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 61,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 60,
  "nextPage": 62,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right and several diagnostic charts (bar, treemap, waterfall) on the right side.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "tree_map",
    "process_diagram",
    "other"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/61",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-61",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.5,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Average notification cycle time by headquarters",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "079014a6-368a-49df-b068-77fb9deef2f5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.5,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Clerk time spent on productive work vs. re-works and resolving errors",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "treemap",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5ee36085-c980-40e5-a4a9-d0c4adddb5f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.6
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Progression of work orders and time in each stage",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "59b8a6ea-b065-4d9b-982c-b752fb27f0e0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.64,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Define, Design, Schedule, Execute, Close",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "18999ee5-4e41-406c-b4e8-e58dae9c6231",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.16,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Order close efficiency: Significant variation, high clerical cost, poor performance vs benchmarks, complex forms. Order close quality: Long cycle times, high re-work, ineffective feedback.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6d9060c7-0dcf-40c4-8956-0e354e9919c7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Average notification cycle time",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba88-725d-aba3-abd69e6d2b4f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Issues and implications - Order close",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e2f44e52-6c26-4f2e-88b4-480937a99ee1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Issue Tree",
      "slug": "issue-tree",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-811d-06297aa49608",
      "evidence": "Issue/implication breakdown for Order close stage.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-811d-0384ef9887b8",
      "evidence": "Title 'Issues and implications - Order close'.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Diagnostic test",
      "slug": "diagnostic-test",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "92497b96-c106-46b9-bb2f-f59c58722622",
      "evidence": "The slide assesses issues in the 'Order close' stage with a focus on efficiency and quality.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bb73ba12-772d-4fef-860c-c16806d7fcfd",
      "evidence": "A waterfall chart is used to show the progression of work orders and time in each stage.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "diagnostic-test",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9b256efa-ea2c-4235-adbc-2e5f0e3afabb",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly labels the right-hand section as 'EXAMPLE DIAGNOSTICS' and uses data to support the 'TYPICAL ISSUES' list.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 68,
      "from": 56,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 56,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
      "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}