{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
  "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
  "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 58,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 57,
  "nextPage": 59,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Design' phase.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "process_diagram",
    "screenshot",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/58",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-58",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.507,
        "y": 0.54
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Variability in estimator output",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "area",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "12ca201a-4346-41c2-84db-803aa33577c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.62,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Estimator productivity trends over time, and change in work mix",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3b7a12c5-f64f-48ba-97cd-473da4624c0c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.64,
        "y": 0.61
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Work progression visibility",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d3af3b55-1e8b-4974-a736-a80801a8f76c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.507,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Estimate accuracy: variance of estimate vs. actual hours to construct a job",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b240a84f-606c-4460-a299-8c3f88da77b4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.022,
        "w": 0.188,
        "x": 0.644,
        "y": 0.168
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Define -> Design -> Schedule -> Execute -> Close",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "66f5b4a5-61cc-4f39-b4ca-8519e8bab51b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.16,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Design efficiency: Significant variation in Throughput, Low utilization, Low design yield, Increasing design function cost. Design quality: Significant discrepancy between estimates vs. actuals, Lax internal design review, Lack of construction feedback. Delivery vs. compliance, customer, construction dates: Unclear T-minus progression.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e7dee3b9-2169-490b-8c5f-85bf3428e417",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Issues and implications - Design",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1e2ba8f6-1aa1-4e63-86ee-d0935065cb75",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Issue Tree",
      "slug": "issue-tree",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-811c-ed76a193b4e5",
      "evidence": "Issue/implication breakdown for Design stage.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-811c-e9bd105f3614",
      "evidence": "Title 'Issues and implications - Design'.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Diagnostic test",
      "slug": "diagnostic-test",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6d2b0289-a696-4253-b57b-7e7b84d7e506",
      "evidence": "This slide continues assessing issues in the 'Design' stage with detailed charts and lists.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "diagnostic-test",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "a2510a60-16d7-47c1-a803-459403ec27ae",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly labels the right-hand side as 'EXAMPLE DIAGNOSTICS' and provides data to support the 'TYPICAL ISSUES' listed on the left.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 68,
      "from": 56,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 56,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
      "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}