{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6",
  "docSlug": "ad48a7aff8040249",
  "documentTitle": "Global Private Equity Report 2016",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 48,
  "pageCount": 72,
  "prevPage": 47,
  "nextPage": 49,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare performance distributions. The text describes the methodology of a deal postmortem for a midsize European PE firm.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_100pct"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6/48",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6#slide-48",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Deals that strayed from PE firms' sweet spot consistently underperformed those that did not.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48d-72e7-ba6b-707af5665c4e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.265,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.592
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Percentage of deals, by multiple on invested capital at exit",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7a76b9cb-8f43-4c8c-9959-a08777c5ed10",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Multiple on invested capital: 2.2X",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48d-72e7-ba6b-74ddccb37887",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.105,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.192
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The process of drawing a sweet spot's boundaries is a detailed and painstaking one. The characteristics that an investment sweet spot reveal do not emerge from guesswork or intuition but from deep probing of data.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "23c1ca9f-5d52-4498-bdd6-50766374a001",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.01,
        "w": 0.105,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.898
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bain analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e74eb1e1-1803-4161-a32a-288a97b0a33f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.535
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 2.9: Deals that strayed from PE firms' sweet spot consistently underperformed those that did not",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9d69bdce-dbd9-4c9e-860a-2ceaa3c92851",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Multiple on invested capital",
      "numberRaw": "2.2X",
      "numberKind": "multiplier",
      "actionTitle": "Deals that strayed from PE firms' sweet spot consistently underperformed those that did not",
      "calloutText": "Deals that strayed from PE firms' sweet spot consistently underperformed those that did not.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 2.2,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-173e-703c-8769-bbfb2a913c22",
      "evidence": "Sweet-spot 2.2x vs strayed 1.3x invested capital.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-173e-703c-8769-b4907f17ed45",
      "evidence": "Title: 'Deals that strayed from PE firms sweet spot consistently underperformed.'",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9ec86ffd-8457-43e8-94b7-687018e0aa70",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-stacked-100pct: Percentage of deals, by multiple on invested capital at exit",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Sinatra Test",
      "slug": "sinatra-test",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-173e-703c-8769-be3d57f6b763",
      "evidence": "Single proof point used to validate the whole sweet-spot thesis.",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "deal-postmortem",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "5e15327d-de0f-43de-9be3-952428dc5e67",
      "evidence": "The text explicitly mentions 'Begin with a deal postmortem' as the first step in the analysis.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 69,
      "from": 45,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-96bfcaddcd0f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "Sweet-spot, thematic, value-creation playbooks plus recession-proofing in Section 3.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    },
    {
      "to": 58,
      "from": 39,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-a09dd459aa75",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Mandate to differentiate via sweet-spot, thematic investing.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 50,
      "from": 45,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-641878009dbe",
      "evidence": "Ambition pyramid (p.45) → sweet-spot circle (p.47) → underperformance evidence (p.48) → 8-dimension radar (p.49).",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Present sweet-spot investing framework with proof",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}