{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499",
  "docSlug": "7716ae6db98267fe",
  "documentTitle": "Syracuse University Diagnostic Report",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 29,
  "pageCount": 38,
  "prevPage": 28,
  "nextPage": 30,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 11,
  "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show salary growth by tier, with a specific callout to the 10.7% growth in the >$120K tier.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499/29",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499#slide-29",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "A system for compensation review that normalizes pay and benefits within bands but preserves unit flexibility would help reduce dissatisfaction with pay and proactively manage talent base.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48c-7655-b30a-80ed95af9695",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Total budgeted salary cost for pinned employees by salary tier (excluding instructional faculty)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "341e95fb-b931-4da6-a814-15b916203d9f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "A system for compensation review; Regular and standardized performance evaluations; Ongoing monitoring of compensation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "47444d34-a210-412b-95b2-84c95b5933c6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Policies for raises and promotions vary across SU; Salary cost growth has outpaced non-salary operating cost growth; Growth driven by raises/promotions; Need for clarity in job requirements.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f8092441-f4c9-4966-b99d-d24f773b70a1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Total budgeted salary cost: $205.3M",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48c-7655-b30a-853e1f7bc9ce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Syracuse HR data",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6796ccbf-383f-4b47-b838-398074ed2df8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Salary & fringe",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6bc74818-fc8f-4b52-9753-1736b82da042",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Total budgeted salary cost",
      "numberRaw": "$205.3M",
      "numberKind": "money",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "A system for compensation review that normalizes pay and benefits within bands but preserves unit flexibility would help reduce dissatisfaction with pay and proactively manage talent base.",
      "numberScale": "m",
      "numberValue": 205.3,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": "$"
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8391a3ac-215f-45b3-8b1d-ddc83f64c020",
      "evidence": "components: list/bullet: Policies for raises and promotions vary across SU; Salary cost growth has outpaced non-salary operating cost growth; Growth driven by raises/promotions; Need for clarity in job requirements.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1804-770a-b244-77f89d61cd47",
      "evidence": "Perspective recommends compensation review system normalizing pay.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1804-770a-b244-7987b4acda8a",
      "evidence": "Two-column diagnostic template.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-e848b59afc53",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "16 deep dives, each with KEY FACTS AND DATA + PERSPECTIVES columns.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 18,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-f462fb7ce078",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "16 opportunity areas with perspectives column.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 65,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 18,
      "name": "Issue Tree",
      "slug": "43-issue-tree",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-b13b8eb589b3",
      "evidence": "p18 numbered tree of 16 areas under 4 themes; pp19-35 walk each leaf with facts+perspectives.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Decompose 'how to improve Syracuse' into 16 MECE opportunity areas",
      "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer",
      "confidence": 90,
      "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}