{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-d2003d3f2763",
  "docSlug": "5ffb0559a8fa9b38",
  "documentTitle": "UNC Chapel Hill Cost Diagnostic",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294,
  "pageNumber": 4,
  "pageCount": 15,
  "prevPage": 3,
  "nextPage": 5,
  "slideType": "diagnosis",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-d2003d3f2763/4",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-d2003d3f2763",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-d2003d3f2763.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-d2003d3f2763#slide-4",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.73,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "All observations contained in this document are for discussion purposes only. This information was prepared solely for the use of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; it is not to be relied on by any 3rd party",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b5e3cb6c-078a-49e0-a2b9-231d37b42a0f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Diagnostic included University Administration and all 14 Schools\nIncreased focus on expenses paid for by General Institutional Support Funds (GISF)\n-GISF includes State Funds and F&A (i.e., overhead)\nAuxiliary Enterprises that impact the use of GISF were analyzed more closely\n-Energy Services, Facilities Services, Printing, Tar Heel Temps\nSome areas were out of scope for the 5-month diagnostic:\n-UNC Health Care System and UNC Physicians & Associates\n-New sources of revenue\n-Capital projects",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "82c977a8-684a-4dc1-89b6-9408f070abb7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.11,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Project scope",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a6dc55e-0dd7-4995-a95d-98b4c49898fe",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "MECE Principle",
      "slug": "mece-principle",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1804-770a-b242-b7aa6c4e8d70",
      "evidence": "Project scope laid out in non-overlapping categories.",
      "confidence": 55
    },
    {
      "name": "Chunking",
      "slug": "chunking",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1804-770a-b242-ba042642a22c",
      "evidence": "Scope grouped into digestible items per inventory.",
      "confidence": 60
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 1,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-c8c4b348c3b3",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Situation & Context",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
      "evidence": "Cover, agenda, objective, scope, project timeline establish the engagement frame.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 88,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-a214a824e07a",
      "evidence": "p.3 states the why and the principles, p.4 the scope, p.5 the phased timeline of the work.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Frame why (cost structure), how (guiding principles) and what (scope + timeline) of the engagement",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 55,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}