{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f",
  "docSlug": "0fc3aba985cbd390",
  "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2018 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 28,
  "pageCount": 51,
  "prevPage": 27,
  "nextPage": 29,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a visual comparison framework to contrast generational archetypes.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f/28",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f#slide-28",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Comparison of Millennial traits (Fluid, Ubiquitous, Universal, Social, Nomad, Mindful) vs Gen Z traits (Individualists, Back in the store, Logo-lovers, Luxury-attitude, Social consumers, Chinese pride)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "other",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0256039f-53d8-4ea1-b9d5-8b3867c478af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.97
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "This information is confidential and was prepared by Bain & Company solely for the use of our client; it is not to be relied on by any 3rd party without Bain's prior written consent",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "507e81dc-5dcd-4907-b83e-27d7ced738c5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "GEN Z ALREADY SHOWING ORIGINAL TRAITS vs. MILLENNIALS, WITH LOCAL SPECIFICITIES EMERGING",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e707c09b-af7f-4b36-807d-aee030b2b48d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8117-51278e6c14a1",
      "evidence": "Title: 'Gen Z showing original traits vs Millennials'",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3f7d57bf-00fd-4bb9-aa12-bd838269f779",
      "evidence": "Comparison of Millennial traits vs Gen Z traits",
      "confidence": 0.8
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8117-56df0e291859",
      "evidence": "Gen Z vs Gen Y traits compared in repeating mini-panels",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "6ccae878-82f9-49bf-989a-d9fee4260800",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side comparison of generational traits",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 45,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-a9e65c2a1e0d",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Six themes unpacking how 'Luxury 2025 will be a different place'",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 80,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-b85e99c5ccbf",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Six themes: China, digital, footprint, youth, cultures, one market",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 26,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-2c8e7ae92aba",
      "evidence": "p27 splits by Gen Z/Y/X/Boomers; p27 right chart isolates +130% from younger gens",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Segment market by generation to surface growth driver",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}