{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-946e3acc8f1c",
  "docSlug": "17fb3bc69445299f",
  "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2017 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 36,
  "pageCount": 47,
  "prevPage": 35,
  "nextPage": 37,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The chart uses a series of bar charts (waterfall-like) to show growth distribution per era, with a trend line overlaying the market performance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "big_number"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-946e3acc8f1c/36",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-946e3acc8f1c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-946e3acc8f1c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-946e3acc8f1c#slide-36",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Revenue CAGR distribution across 5 eras",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7c0e9bf4-3409-4ac6-aad1-19767d87af92",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "% winners",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "289022bf-838a-4e32-837a-fb400013b142",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Revenue CAGR: ~65%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48a-77cd-a355-578c1788481f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Global personal luxury goods market CAGR",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec770025-e041-4cd6-bf52-4a02a907e925",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "BEST-IN-CLASS PLAYERS LEADING THE WAVE OF CHANGE, YET GROWTH POLARIZATION REMAINS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d8c0e237-de4a-48b0-9bd4-26a9ec4d3455",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "REVENUE CAGR OF SELECTED SOFT PERSONAL LUXURY GOODS BRANDS BY ERA",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0456e16-66bf-45cc-b004-dd2bdc478020",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Revenue CAGR",
      "numberRaw": "~65%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "BEST-IN-CLASS PLAYERS LEADING THE WAVE OF CHANGE, YET GROWTH POLARIZATION REMAINS",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 65,
      "metricFamily": "growth_rate",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8115-bca2dd64b15e",
      "evidence": "Title states 'best-in-class leading wave of change, yet polarization remains'.",
      "confidence": 88
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f4f7f6ef-7d23-465f-a1b5-757a0e63b100",
      "evidence": "Revenue CAGR distribution across 5 eras",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8115-c3f506771b54",
      "evidence": "Red bars for positive CAGR, grey for negative CAGR across each era.",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8115-c65e39a5d732",
      "evidence": "Five identical bar-distribution charts for five eras enable comparison.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8115-c82a5ecac0b4",
      "evidence": "Red trend line overlaid on bar charts shows winners-share trajectory.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Era Timeline / Cycle",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1d21-7467-a461-eb6a8d5702e4",
      "evidence": "Five labelled eras (Sortie du Temple, Crisis, Chinese Bulimia, Reboot, New Normal) with overlaid trajectory line.",
      "confidence": 72
    },
    {
      "name": "market-segmentation-pyramid",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "2f0f1f72-f455-4958-9f97-52a19eb4884a",
      "evidence": "Categorization of brands by growth performance over time",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 41,
      "from": 29,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-8939b336fa7b",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Reframing slides on aspiration, story-living, polarization plus on-a-page recap of seven themes.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 35,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-9f0cc918dbff",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Profitability data, polarization charts, capex-to-opex shift.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 62,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 35,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-19444e5c223e",
      "evidence": "Polarization (~65% winners), winners-only profit data, capex-to-opex shift contrasting cohorts.",
      "position": 8,
      "objective": "Split winners vs losers and explain economics shift",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 72,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}