{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216",
  "docSlug": "5415c04bdc8a86e3",
  "documentTitle": "Agile Innovation Brief",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 14,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 13,
  "nextPage": 15,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "The slide uses a timeline-based comparison of three development scenarios to illustrate the value of Agile prioritization.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "timeline_visual",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216/14",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216#slide-14",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "By focusing on one feature at a time, the apparel company's engineers minimize context switching costs and reduce development times by 40%.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48b-703a-a625-78af0838a761",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.115,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.715
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Sequenced and focused timeline and value table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "175b9408-e134-4306-95e6-ab2d1535dcf0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.085,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.485
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Concurrent multitasking timeline and value table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "39a3827d-932b-4690-8bf6-7fc69e76d26c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.115,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.585
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Ranked and sequenced timeline and value table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ed226889-f274-46fa-91a6-27706a65f9cc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Value index: 2.9X",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-b48b-703a-a625-7cec4060320b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.325,
        "w": 0.764,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.115
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "But which should they start on? How can the company rank development activities when all the features are essential? The engineering team suggests a methodology based on revenue potential, required investments and contributions to other initiatives...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f6bb0cae-c5ad-4adb-a678-07725a377104",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.01,
        "w": 0.105,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.845
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bain & Company",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "59a595d9-1fe1-404d-badb-8aa01e213ad4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.125,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.077
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Agile innovation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4fe664be-c3b4-4b0e-82ee-a733218890d0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.015,
        "w": 0.135,
        "x": 0.118,
        "y": 0.465
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "24-month scenarios",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e25217e8-43b1-47a2-85ad-ba32f922060f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Value index",
      "numberRaw": "2.9X",
      "numberKind": "multiplier",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "By focusing on one feature at a time, the apparel company's engineers minimize context switching costs and reduce development times by 40%.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 2.9,
      "metricFamily": "index_score",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-7d4cffc7aaab",
      "evidence": "Value totals 132, 294, 382.8 + circled 2.2x and 2.9X multipliers.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-869ca63c1012",
      "evidence": "Red stripe denotes wasted time; greyscale blocks encode sequenced features.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-8c7becbc133a",
      "evidence": "Specific values per task (10/7/5), specific months (6, 12, 10.8), 2.9X result.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-8149aa3c539c",
      "evidence": "Striped chaotic top row vs ordered phased blocks below makes the delta visceral.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Data-Ink Ratio",
      "slug": "data-ink-ratio",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-8a78118b9047",
      "evidence": "Schedule grid + value tables, no chartjunk.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-7a9b1f715b21",
      "evidence": "Three identical 24-month grids stacked: Concurrent, Ranked-and-sequenced, Sequenced-and-focused.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-16c4-7148-8114-93cd6454ed19",
      "evidence": "2.2x and 2.9X are circled in red against muted table - made to pop.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6186ad44-5e26-44e4-aa5e-50cbb2c69722",
      "evidence": "Concurrent multitasking timeline and value table",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Agile Methodology",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "c0635d08-3fce-4739-b7c0-d85ed13c6b92",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly discusses Agile innovation, sequencing, and iterative development.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Agile Value Bridge (24-month scenarios)",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1d21-7467-a461-d41a74635500",
      "evidence": "Three-scenario value bridge with 132, 294, 382.8 value indices and 2.2x / 2.9X multipliers.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 14,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-7274fbc3cbba",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Tome's Law, 5 pillars, apparel retailer scenarios deliver 2.2x and 2.9X value index.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 14,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-8136de322fe4",
      "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
      "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
      "beatName": "The Bridge",
      "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge",
      "evidence": "When-Agile-works conditions, 5 pillars, value-bridge math from concurrent to focused.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 14,
      "from": 13,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-fbe78078cdaf",
      "evidence": "Concurrent (132) vs Ranked-and-sequenced (294, 2.2x) vs Sequenced-and-focused (382.8, 2.9X) value indices.",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Compare three execution scenarios to recommend sequenced-and-focused Agile",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}