{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b",
  "docSlug": "ba98a55afa8090f8",
  "documentTitle": "2017 China Luxury Market Study",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 14,
  "pageCount": 22,
  "prevPage": 13,
  "nextPage": 15,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 5,
  "notes": "The chart is a stacked bar representing the distribution of the top 20 brands by growth rate segments.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "infographic",
    "photo",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b/14",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b#slide-14",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.38,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "2016-17 domestic market growth: 20%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cabd50d0-050c-4ebf-88cd-d526d672e073",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Number of brands by growth rate",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a4a21111-70ae-4bf7-82a0-f3a9b80f5765",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Constant \"newness\" and \"fashion\" creation; Harness the power of digital; Improve store experience and customer service; Use fast fashion model to enable speedy replenishment",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "89169283-c7e8-4fe2-a4f2-5214f1c4c28b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Growth rate: 20%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba87-7184-bba7-f8375cad249e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: Top 20 fashion brands ranked by revenue by 2017, covering leather goods, men's wear, women's wear and shoes. Sources: Expert interview; Lit search; Bain analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a329fa6a-0752-4f01-b08c-26e01b85e4ee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Large variance observed across fashion and lifestyle brands' performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "62d42233-a7d0-441a-b60a-e62748463a5c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Growth rate",
      "numberRaw": "20%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Large variance observed across fashion and lifestyle brands' performance",
      "calloutText": "2016-17 domestic market growth: 20%",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 20,
      "metricFamily": "growth_rate",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-3dc81b735b8d",
      "evidence": "Loop opens by pairing laggards' performance against winning brands' KSFs.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-2fc21ba32cd0",
      "evidence": "Title: 'Large variance observed across fashion and lifestyle brands' performance'.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-3a8e562bba40",
      "evidence": "Red callout '20%' and red bars accent the laggards / market growth benchmark.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-30ccd31b2aa7",
      "evidence": "Left = variance distribution; right = winning-brands KSFs.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-3477ceb0a994",
      "evidence": "Two-panel layout with stacked bar then KSF cards.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-087fdfd0e9a7",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Variance + winning brands' KSFs, digital/WeChat playbook, fast-fashion playbook.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 75,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-1b3c53042132",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Channel framework + winning brands' KSFs.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 14,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-9d2ff5729862",
      "evidence": "Performance distribution (left) paired with KSFs of winning brands (right) to set the gap-as-opportunity.",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Show variance between winners and laggards, then name the KSFs",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 72,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}