{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b",
  "docSlug": "ba98a55afa8090f8",
  "documentTitle": "2017 China Luxury Market Study",
  "authorId": "Bain",
  "authorName": "Bain",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 11,
  "pageCount": 22,
  "prevPage": 10,
  "nextPage": 12,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "Notes: Underwear, children's wear, watch/jewelry/accessory counters and outlet stores not included for any brand; Different labels in one store are counted as one; multiple stores of one brand in a single shopping mall are also counted as one (e.g., shoe store on 1st floor while outfit store on 3rd floor)",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "waterfall_chart",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b/11",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-8b4f8825545b#slide-11",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "More than 50% of the top 20 brands consolidated their networks with fewer but bigger stores",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba87-7184-bba9-977d0b0deaf8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "STORE FOOTPRINT OF TOP 20 BRANDS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "61e2cfbf-1e8a-4cd1-86ca-30d8e07cbee9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Notes: Underwear, children's wear, watch/jewelry/accessory counters and outlet stores not included for any brand; Different labels in one store are counted as one; multiple stores of one brand in a single shopping mall are also counted as one (e.g., shoe store on 1st floor while outfit store on 3rd floor)\nSources: Analyst report; Official website; Expert interview; Bain analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1b0436b1-f5c6-43d9-bf7c-0a9067d3a13e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.62,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Most brands are reassessing their store footprints\n- More than 50% of the top 20 brands consolidated their networks with fewer but bigger stores\n- A few accessible luxury brands continue to extend their footprint at a rapid pace",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a68dff81-1396-486b-aedb-bbcf30c262c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Number of retail stores: 1,119",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-ba87-7184-bba9-99018c0e945d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Many brands re-assessing and reducing their store footprint",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "db817637-e4d4-42e3-a7cf-3607f5a5b762",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Number of retail stores",
      "numberRaw": "1,119",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Many brands re-assessing and reducing their store footprint",
      "calloutText": "More than 50% of the top 20 brands consolidated their networks with fewer but bigger stores",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 1.119,
      "metricFamily": "volume_count",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6be-fe58524066ed",
      "evidence": "Title: 'Many brands re-assessing and reducing their store footprint'.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-034b485f14f8",
      "evidence": "1,119 store stat anchors the callout.",
      "confidence": 72
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1640-705b-b6bf-073f1f560764",
      "evidence": "Sparse layout puts the 1,119 figure in isolation.",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "56ab47e2-5c0b-40d7-a956-35b7bd96a3ec",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall: STORE FOOTPRINT OF TOP 20 BRANDS",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-052d4d96e379",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Growth data, millennials evidence, channel landscape with 2x2 on p12.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 75,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 11,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-17d8e842851b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Millennials reshape demand; channels need adjustment.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "2x2 Matrix",
      "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
      "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-9a9fec6a1d9d",
      "evidence": "Online growth setup (p10-11) -> matrix with axes 'price level' x 'brand control' (p12) -> Brand.com sweet-spot (p13).",
      "position": 3,
      "objective": "Map the online channel landscape and surface Brand.com as the winner",
      "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}