{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c",
  "docSlug": "7561802f6a67abba",
  "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future Standalone",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 31,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "Uses a value chain framework to map infrastructure investment and capacity growth.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "process_diagram",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Pipelines and facilities see highest levels of investment and capacity growth; Storage capacity has remained relatively flat in the past few years despite rising supply and demand.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb9-741a-8347-ee238bbba418",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.13,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.53
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "LNG value chain",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af6d1299-2e9f-43c2-a1f8-46d2d7ee0c68",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.13,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.235
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Natural gas value chain",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f2e3c931-85cc-4515-97cb-53647932fdd8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Value Chain",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Structuring frame",
      "toolSlug": "structuring-frame",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb9-741a-8347-f7b8609a045f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.33,
        "x": 0.63,
        "y": 0.63
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Pipelines and facilities see highest levels of investment and capacity growth. Storage capacity has remained relatively flat in the past few years despite rising supply and demand",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9e5bf51a-2a7f-4789-af76-bb0116aa09be",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Investment: $250 billion",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb9-741a-8347-f3a9f78fa2d0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.815
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: GlobalData; EIA; Rystad Energy; BCG analysis. Note: Pipeline cost is counted when it reaches commissioning, not when outlays occur. bcf = billion cubic feet; CAGR = compound annual growth rate; Mcm = million cubic meters; MT = million tons.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "76bba43d-2b9d-48a3-ac1a-53dcefec1635",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Over $250 billion has been invested in US infrastructure to deliver natural gas to demand centers, but capacity remains inadequate",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f9b2c32-b8aa-4113-85ac-4e65ad68dbd1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Investment",
      "numberRaw": "$250 billion",
      "numberKind": "money",
      "actionTitle": "Over $250 billion has been invested in US infrastructure to deliver natural gas to demand centers, but capacity remains inadequate",
      "calloutText": "Pipelines and facilities see highest levels of investment and capacity growth; Storage capacity has remained relatively flat in the past few years despite rising supply and demand.",
      "numberScale": "b",
      "numberValue": 250,
      "metricFamily": "market_size",
      "numberCurrency": "$"
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-163f-72bd-8a08-42d3e13f50f5",
      "evidence": "Title: '$250 billion ... but capacity remains inadequate'.",
      "confidence": 95
    },
    {
      "name": "Picture Superiority Effect",
      "slug": "picture-superiority-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-163f-72bd-8a08-4b1d9931357e",
      "evidence": "Iconographic value-chain stages (rig, plant, pipeline, ship) carry meaning visually.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-163f-72bd-8a08-4730f734325a",
      "evidence": "Takeaways box delivers the so-what (storage flat despite rising supply/demand).",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-163f-72bd-8a08-4f2022aa34d2",
      "evidence": "Storage box is dashed-outlined to stand out as the bottleneck.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "value-chain",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "eedb67e3-d362-4fc9-a7f8-8223002f39fd",
      "evidence": "Visual representation of sequential industry processes (Extraction to Distribution/Regasification)",
      "confidence": 1
    },
    {
      "name": "Value Chain",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1d21-7467-a460-ce36feea1f3e",
      "evidence": "Two labelled rows: 'Natural gas value chain' and 'LNG value chain' with named stages.",
      "confidence": 95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-8bcd0bfd1a52",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Demand trifecta (pp.10-15) plus three constraints and value-chain inadequacy (pp.19-21).",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 16,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-9e484e8c082c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Five scenarios and three constraints surface the so-what.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Value Chain Walk",
      "slug": "44-value-chain-walk",
      "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-a9c870797f33",
      "evidence": "p.20 lists three constraint categories; p.21 walks the natural-gas and LNG value chain segments showing where capacity lags.",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Identify constraints across the gas value chain",
      "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}