{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-61bacb2712d3",
  "docSlug": "0b9e49eefd662629",
  "documentTitle": "AI at Work APAC",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.91,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 22,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "Data compares APAC results with global benchmarks.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "donut_chart",
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-61bacb2712d3/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-61bacb2712d3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-61bacb2712d3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-61bacb2712d3#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "APAC markets are experimenting more than global peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb4-722b-b49a-828ddaa7bb6f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "My company's current use of AI agents",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "726a680a-d282-4677-849b-c54f187a4789",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.58
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "33% have a proper understanding",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "donut",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "abdd5bd9-9890-415f-ac1c-2057f5ddea9d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "73% think AI agents will be important",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "donut",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d701990a-d16b-4f69-8b98-9abbe96c433e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "AI agent adoption and understanding: 73%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb4-722b-b49a-8719447bebff",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: AI at Work APAC, July 2025 (N=2,516); AI at Work Global, 2025: Japan (n=1,012) + India (n=1,031); BCG analysis.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4df1ca2f-0ade-48cf-9981-df6af09f13f4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Still early days for AI agents: While 73% see their potential, only 33% understand them, and most are still experimenting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5bad215-043d-4208-a29d-2432275204f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "AI agent adoption and understanding",
      "numberRaw": "73%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Still early days for AI agents: While 73% see their potential, only 33% understand them, and most are still experimenting",
      "calloutText": "APAC markets are experimenting more than global peers",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 73,
      "metricFamily": "share_penetration",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Tension Management",
      "slug": "tension-management",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6f6-cf879bfa90cb",
      "evidence": "Opens new tension cycle on agents/shadow AI risks.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6f6-c31f38f84e88",
      "evidence": "Title 'Still early days for AI agents: While 73% see potential, only 33% understand them'",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6f6-cae1477e410c",
      "evidence": "Specific 73%, 33%, and APAC vs global figures.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b6f6-c6086efa0f23",
      "evidence": "73% vs 33% gap quantified to dramatize early-stage.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-cd3a1b9da151",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Adoption stats, optimism breakdowns, fears, leadership gap, agents, shadow AI",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-d91f1f68e2e6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Fears, leadership gap, agent barriers, shadow AI risk",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-360375fb18bb",
      "evidence": "Agent barriers (p.15-16) + rising shadow AI (p.17) → must formalize governance now (p.18).",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Show accumulating risk from un-governed AI agents and shadow AI",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 76,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}