{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-59779ec3081e",
  "docSlug": "4740c2ebb8fe0e58",
  "documentTitle": "AI Raising Stakes Cybersecurity",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 20,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-59779ec3081e/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-59779ec3081e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-59779ec3081e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-59779ec3081e#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.4,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "14% of cyber attacks were AI-enabled, 46% were suspected to be AI-enabled, 40% were not AI-enabled",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0ea07118-710f-4c87-a0b4-58b9908306f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "AI-enabled cyberattacks: 60%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb8-762a-a730-9bc38f592f01",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: BCG Cyber x AI Report 2025 (n=500); BCG analysis.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc98219b-53d3-4cec-8f17-7fbf05811cb5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "60% of recent cyberattacks suggest AI involvement",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "94c4c5a7-3485-45a2-abe5-ab0fdc7143af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "AI-enabled cyberattacks",
      "numberRaw": "60%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "60% of recent cyberattacks suggest AI involvement",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 60,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-121f-71e6-8e91-c7d2e9e6bb19",
      "evidence": "Title quantifies insight: '60% of recent cyberattacks suggest AI involvement.'",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6b7ff84e-d19f-4367-b9c0-2e3456938498",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-horizontal: 14% of cyber attacks were AI-enabled, 46% were suspected to be AI-enabled, 40% were not AI-enabled",
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    {
      "name": "Emotional Appeal",
      "slug": "emotional-appeal",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-121f-71e6-8e91-cdf61b9bdb80",
      "evidence": "Threat framing escalates emotional stakes.",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-121f-71e6-8e91-c84efda6a906",
      "evidence": "Single dominant 60% number on sparse layout.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-732f05ca8a45",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Exec summary 'offense scaling faster than defense' + threat data + industry/region gap.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 75,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-eb6a7556c155",
      "evidence": "53% rank AI threats top-3 vs only 7% have AI defenses installed; explicit awareness-action gap.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Contrast high awareness/threat reality with near-zero AI defense adoption",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}