{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457",
  "docSlug": "6dcd3449fa2bada6",
  "documentTitle": "Draft BCG proposal Mercury Genesis Energy",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.707,
  "pageNumber": 7,
  "pageCount": 11,
  "prevPage": 6,
  "nextPage": 8,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "BCG slide, likely part of a larger energy transition study.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457/7",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457#slide-7",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "BCG Boston Consulting Group",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea8bdb1e-4474-4a30-933f-a42f6b864253",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Supply and Demand by pathway: Supply by generation type, Demand by demand source, Storage and system flexibility, Options to transition away from fossil fuels, New technologies.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "03192537-c677-44fb-85b1-03e4d21fe718",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Implications of each pathway: Emissions Reductions, Affordability/cost, Reliability/resilience, Security of supply, Assessment of key risks (Investment uncertainty, Market failures), Broader narrative.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f14304db-32fc-4391-9e03-3eca3b9bf207",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.87
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "4 Assessment will include an aggregate investment number for the distribution sector, but not for each individual network",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f815b24-2cea-42d4-b6f1-0c48811160fe",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "MECE Principle",
      "slug": "mece-principle",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1321-706c-9a5f-897ea5d033a6",
      "evidence": "Pathway analysed across distinct buckets: Supply/Demand, Storage, Fossil transition, New tech",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1321-706c-9a5f-86480bf34940",
      "evidence": "Specific dimensions: emissions, affordability/cost, reliability, security/dry year risk, market failures",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Energy Trilemma",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca6-71be-9e57-a3d41ffc731f",
      "evidence": "Lists trilemma outcomes: affordability/cost, reliability of supply, security/dry year risk",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-39220102798c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Sections 2 (Objectives), 3 (Scope), and roadmap pathway breakdown",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-5b1375ba4f1e",
      "evidence": "Nested bullet structure decomposes deliverables, context, whole-of-sector view, supply/demand, storage, networks into distinct categories",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Comprehensively scope the proposed deliverables and pathway dimensions",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}