{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
  "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9",
  "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 32,
  "pageCount": 63,
  "prevPage": 31,
  "nextPage": 33,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to compare two distinct market compositions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_100pct",
    "headline_text"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/32",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-32",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.225
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Payment methods in China vs the US in 2011 (%)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9824cc39-304d-42d5-827a-eda0113437a5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Payment method share: 65%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acb6-775d-9285-7adb59431d44",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: Euromonitor, BCG analysis.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "118acb1f-a0f6-4b6b-9b91-d88a899af2ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "When mobile payments were introduced, cash dominated offline transactions in China, while the US had a well-established credit card ecosystem",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9b28a26f-86eb-4dcd-8c1b-bd5eecd3eef4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Payment method share",
      "numberRaw": "65%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "When mobile payments were introduced, cash dominated offline transactions in China, while the US had a well-established credit card ecosystem",
      "calloutText": null,
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 65,
      "metricFamily": "share_penetration",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1321-706c-9a5b-b624614306b1",
      "evidence": "Title 'cash dominated... US had... credit card ecosystem'.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f96855b8-64aa-4d4d-86d6-28e756788b2f",
      "evidence": "When mobile payments were introduced, cash dominated offline transactions in China, while the US had a well-established credit card ecosystem",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 25,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 72,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 55,
      "from": 25,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 58,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 34,
      "from": 32,
      "name": "Before After",
      "slug": "21-before-after",
      "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-0047a8ad09a4",
      "evidence": "Cash-dominant before (p32-33) → mobile payments 70x US after (p34).",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Prove mobile payments leapfrog vs cash baseline",
      "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}