{
  "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
  "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.445,
  "pageNumber": 93,
  "pageCount": 482,
  "prevPage": 92,
  "nextPage": 94,
  "slideType": "recommendation",
  "function": "recommend",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table to highlight Scenario B, with a callout box explaining the rationale and a footer note addressing the primary risk.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "icon_grid",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/93",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-93",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.83
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Primære risiko ved Scenarie B består i rekrutteringsudfordringen – denne afhjælpes med ekstern assistance og relativ høj lønkvante",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3b34e0f6-e109-4218-a35f-cd28f2455be1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Rationale for choosing Scenario B: Significant revenue, focus on development projects, balanced risk/feasibility, and weaknesses of A and C.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bda8ecb4-38f3-4cb9-b702-7380700438bd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Annual yield: 6-10 mio. kr.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a677-7039-bfd7-7d2b11e074ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Vurderingen baseret på afvejning af potentiale, realiserbarhed og risiko",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "20fc6d1b-f646-4e36-9ed9-6df007a0e442",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of Scenarios A, B, and C across Insourced AV, Recruitment challenge, Consultant price, and Revenue.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "42294d18-e939-419f-8f40-8d63d225e2b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Midterste scenarie anbefales som passende ambitionsniveau",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "41884e65-b4b4-4c70-a585-0d2e55035057",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Annual yield",
      "numberRaw": "6-10 mio. kr.",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Midterste scenarie anbefales som passende ambitionsniveau",
      "calloutText": "Primære risiko ved Scenarie B består i rekrutteringsudfordringen – denne afhjælpes med ekstern assistance og relativ høj lønkvante",
      "numberScale": "m",
      "numberValue": -10,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5eb62db3-4d54-43de-8a47-acef8129ba2a",
      "evidence": "Comparison table of Scenarios A, B, and C across Insourced AV, Recruitment challenge, Consultant price, and Revenue.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Centre-Stage Effect",
      "slug": "centre-stage-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-12a5-7665-b700-e0947b16366b",
      "evidence": "'Midterste scenarie anbefales' - explicitly chooses middle option.",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "scenario_analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4fb10f5c-d8fb-4ed0-9f5f-9f63bc4b357a",
      "evidence": "Comparison of scenarios A, B, and C",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 321,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    },
    {
      "to": 165,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 97,
      "from": 84,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82",
      "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 88,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}